Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Magnetic resonance venography of the upper venous system with blood pool contrast agent: comparison of two different T1-weighted sequences.

Boettcher J, Pfeil A, Wolf G, Hansch A.

Clin Imaging. 2013 Mar-Apr;37(2):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.06.007.

PMID:
23465975
2.

Magnetic resonance VIBE venography using the blood pool contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium--an interrater reliability study.

Pfeil A, Betge S, Poehlmann G, Boettcher J, Drescher R, Malich A, Wolf G, Mentzel HJ, Hansch A.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.102.

PMID:
21349675
3.

Combined magnetic resonance imaging of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary arteries after a single injection of a blood pool contrast agent.

Hansch A, Betge S, Poehlmann G, Neumann S, Baltzer P, Pfeil A, Waginger M, Boettcher J, Kaiser WA, Wolf G, Mentzel HJ.

Eur Radiol. 2011 Feb;21(2):318-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1918-0.

PMID:
20694795
4.

Abdominopelvic and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR venography with a blood-pool agent.

Huang SY, Kim CY, Miller MJ, Gupta RT, Lessne ML, Horvath JJ, Boll DT, Evans PD, Befera NT, Krishnan P, Chan JL, Merkle EM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):208-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9611.

PMID:
23789677
5.

Performance of spin-echo and gradient-echo T1-weighted sequences for evaluation of dural venous sinus thrombosis and stenosis.

Saindane AM, Mitchell BC, Kang J, Desai NK, Dehkharghani S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):162-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9095.

PMID:
23789671
6.

Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck.

Wu X, Raz E, Block TK, Geppert C, Hagiwara M, Bruno MT, Fatterpekar GM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):883-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11729.

PMID:
25247956
7.

Gadofosveset: parameter optimization for steady-state imaging of the thoracic and abdominal vasculature.

Haneder S, Attenberger UI, Biffar A, Dietrich O, Fink C, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ.

Invest Radiol. 2011 Nov;46(11):678-85. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31822428ad.

PMID:
21709565
8.
9.

Comparison of gadofosveset trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine during time-resolved thoracic MR angiography at 3T.

Frydrychowicz A, Russe MF, Bock J, Stalder AF, Bley TA, Harloff A, Markl M.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Nov;17(11):1394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.022.

PMID:
20650665
10.

Peripheral MRA with k-space segmentation and blood-pool contrast agent.

Kinner S, Zenge MO, Heilmaier C, de Greiff A, Vogt FM, Ladd ME, Barkhausen J, Quick HH.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Jan;18(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.08.009.

PMID:
20947388
11.

Free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequence: a viable alternative for contrast-enhanced liver imaging in patients unable to suspend respiration.

Chandarana H, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB, Lim RP, Kim D, Mossa DJ, Babb JS, Kiefer B, Lee VS.

Invest Radiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):648-53. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821eea45.

PMID:
21577119
12.
14.

Display of dural sinuses with time-resolved, contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography.

Meckel S, Glücker TM, Kretzschmar M, Scheffler K, Radü EW, Wetzel SG.

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(3):217-24. doi: 10.1159/000113859.

PMID:
18216463
15.

Three-dimensional cerebral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography at 3.0 Tesla: initial results using highly accelerated parallel acquisition.

Nael K, Fenchel M, Salamon N, Duckwiler GR, Laub G, Finn JP, Villablanca JP.

Invest Radiol. 2006 Oct;41(10):763-8.

PMID:
16971800
16.

Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venography to evaluate central venous steno-occlusive disease in hemodialysis patients.

Gao K, Jiang H, Zhai RY, Wang JF, Wei BJ, Huang Q.

Clin Radiol. 2012 Jun;67(6):560-3. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.11.010.

PMID:
22218408
17.

Retrospective assessment of the utility of an iron-based agent for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in patients with endstage renal diseases.

Bashir MR, Mody R, Neville A, Javan R, Seaman D, Kim CY, Gupta RT, Jaffe TA.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jul;40(1):113-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24330.

PMID:
24130008
18.

Gd-DTPA-enhanced 3D MR imaging of cervical degenerative disk disease: initial experience.

Ross JS, Ruggieri PM, Tkach JA, Masaryk TJ, Paranandi L, Dillinger JJ, Modic MT.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992 Jan-Feb;13(1):127-36.

PMID:
1595430
19.

Advantages of blood pool contrast agents in MR angiography: a pictorial review.

Lewis M, Yanny S, Malcolm PN.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012 Apr;56(2):187-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02347.x. Review.

PMID:
22498192
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center