Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation.

Kitada M, Sakai T, Murase T, Hanada T, Nakamura N, Sugano N.

Int J Med Robot. 2013 Jun;9(2):223-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1490. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

PMID:
23460526
2.

A comparison of conventional guidewire alignment jigs with imageless computer navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Olsen M, Chiu M, Gamble P, Boyle RA, Tumia N, Schemitsch EH.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1834-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00648.

PMID:
20686057
3.

Preliminary application of computer-assisted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip.

Zhang YZ, Chen B, Lu S, Yang Y, Zhao JM, Liu R, Li YB, Pei GX.

Int J Med Robot. 2011 Dec;7(4):469-74. doi: 10.1002/rcs.423. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

PMID:
22113980
4.

Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.

Bailey C, Gul R, Falworth M, Zadow S, Oakeshott R.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):917-22. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0584-x. Epub 2008 Oct 30.

5.

The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.

Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty K, Waddell JP, Schemitsch E.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):557-60.

6.

Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.

Gravius S, Belei P, de la Fuente M, Radermacher K, Mumme T.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(4):565-76.

PMID:
20476504
7.

Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty.

Sugano N.

Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Mar;5(1):1-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.1.1. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Review.

8.

Evaluation of the accuracy of femoral component orientation by the CT-based fluoro-matched navigation system.

Hayashi S, Nishiyama T, Fujishiro T, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M.

Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1063-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1852-2. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

9.

Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Olsen M, Davis ET, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Mar;91(3):310-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21288.

PMID:
19258604
10.

[Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: first experimental trial].

Gravius S, Belei P, de la Fuente M, Müller-Rath R, Radermacher K, Christian Wirtz D, Mumme T.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2008 Aug;53(4):204-12. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2008.026. German.

PMID:
18643714
11.

Evaluation of a patient specific femoral alignment guide for hip resurfacing.

Olsen M, Naudie DD, Edwards MR, Sellan ME, McCalden RW, Schemitsch EH.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

PMID:
24034907
12.

Registration stability of physical templates in hip surgery.

Kunz M, Rudan JF, Wood GC, Ellis RE.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:283-9.

PMID:
21335806
13.

Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.

Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH, Kim CY, Han JH, Na SE, Lee CH, Kim JG, Park YS.

Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.

PMID:
22348661
14.

How accurate is image-free computer navigation for hip resurfacing arthroplasty? An anatomical investigation.

Schnurr C, Nessler J, Meyer C, Schild HH, Koebke J, König DP.

J Orthop Sci. 2009 Sep;14(5):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1356-5. Epub 2009 Oct 3.

PMID:
19802660
15.

Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):119-27. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0598-4. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

16.

Computer navigation experience in hip resurfacing improves femoral component alignment using a conventional jig.

Morison Z, Mehra A, Olsen M, Donnelly M, Schemitsch E.

Indian J Orthop. 2013 Nov;47(6):585-90. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.121585.

17.

A hybrid CT-free navigation system for total hip arthroplasty.

Zheng G, Marx A, Langlotz U, Widmer KH, Buttaro M, Nolte LP.

Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7(3):129-45.

PMID:
12362374
18.

Ultrasound-based computer navigation: an accurate measurement tool for determining combined anteversion?

Wassilew GI, Janz V, Heller MO, König C, Perka C, Südhoff I, Seeger JB, Hasart O.

Technol Health Care. 2012;20(6):535-43. doi: 10.3233/THC-2012-00699.

PMID:
23187019
19.

Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.

Lin F, Lim D, Wixson RL, Milos S, Hendrix RW, Makhsous M.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Oct;23(8):1004-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 Jun 9.

PMID:
18541352
20.

[Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study].

Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM.

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):238-46. French.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk