Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 336

1.

Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Karpova A, Arun R, Davis AM, Kulkarni AV, Massicotte EM, Mikulis DJ, Lubina ZI, Fehlings MG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 1;38(5):392-400. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182715bc3.

PMID:
23448898
2.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging is associated with baseline neurological status and can predict postoperative recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Arvin B, Kalsi-Ryan S, Mercier D, Furlan JC, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1170-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828e23a8.

PMID:
23462574
3.

Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS, Gaikwad S, Pandey RM.

Spine J. 2003 Jan-Feb;3(1):33-45.

PMID:
14589243
4.

Do quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters correlate with the clinical presentation and functional outcomes after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A prospective multicenter study.

Karpova A, Arun R, Kalsi-Ryan S, Massicotte EM, Kopjar B, Fehlings MG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Aug 15;39(18):1488-97. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000436.

PMID:
24859570
5.

Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Wang LF, Ding WY, Xu JX, He J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 1;35(10):E396-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6dbc4.

PMID:
20393392
6.

Correlation of quality of life and functional outcome measures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Lubelski D, Alvin MD, Nesterenko S, Sundar SJ, Thompson NR, Benzel EC, Mroz TE.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):483-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.SPINE159. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

PMID:
26613280
7.

A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study.

Tetreault LA, Kopjar B, Vaccaro A, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18;95(18):1659-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01323.

PMID:
24048553
8.

Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with the clinical assessment of disease severity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and predicts outcome following surgery.

Jones JG, Cen SY, Lebel RM, Hsieh PC, Law M.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Feb;34(2):471-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3199. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

9.

Modified K-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcome in patients with nonlordotic alignment after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Taniyama T, Hirai T, Yoshii T, Yamada T, Yasuda H, Saito M, Inose H, Kato T, Kawabata S, Okawa A.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 1;39(21):E1261-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000531.

PMID:
25077905
10.

Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and mri of the spinal cord.

Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K, Yamasaki D, Nanjo Y.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jun 1;26(11):1238-45.

PMID:
11389390
11.

Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.

Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Kihara M, Horiuchi Y.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan;12(1):59-65. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08940.

PMID:
20043766
12.

A Clinical Prediction Rule for Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of an International Prospective Multicenter Data Set of 757 Subjects.

Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Côté P, Arnold P, Fehlings MG.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 16;97(24):2038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00189.

PMID:
26677238
13.

Prospective cohort study of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy without surgical treatment.

Sumi M, Miyamoto H, Suzuki T, Kaneyama S, Kanatani T, Uno K.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):8-14. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11395. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

PMID:
21981274
14.

Mild diabetes is not a contraindication for surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America multicenter prospective study (CSM).

Arnold PM, Fehlings MG, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Massicotte EM, Vaccaro AR, Brodke DS, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Woodard EJ, Banco RJ, Chapman JR, Janssen ME, Bono CM, Sasso RC, Dekutoski MB, Gokaslan ZL.

Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

PMID:
23981820
15.

Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study.

Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM, Vaccaro AR, Brodke DS, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Woodard EJ, Banco RJ, Chapman JR, Janssen ME, Bono CM, Sasso RC, Dekutoski MB, Gokaslan ZL.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18;95(18):1651-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00589.

PMID:
24048552
16.

MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes.

Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jul 1;32(15):1675-8; discussion 1679.

PMID:
17621217
17.

Is diffusion anisotropy a biomarker for disease severity and surgical prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Wen CY, Cui JL, Liu HS, Mak KC, Cheung WY, Luk KD, Hu Y.

Radiology. 2014 Jan;270(1):197-204. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121885. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

PMID:
23942607
18.

Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Alafifi T, Kern R, Fehlings M.

J Neuroimaging. 2007 Oct;17(4):315-22.

PMID:
17894620
19.

Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.

Miura J, Doita M, Miyata K, Marui T, Nishida K, Fujii M, Kurosaka M.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Feb;22(1):8-13. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815f2556.

PMID:
19190428
20.

Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Revanappa KK, Rajshekhar V.

Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20(9):1545-51. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1773-y. Epub 2011 Mar 20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center