Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 123

1.

Use of multivariate statistics to identify unreliable data obtained using CASA.

Martínez LB, Crispín RH, Mendoza MM, Gallegos OH, Martínez AA.

Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2013 Jun;59(3):164-71. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2013.766281. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23394290
2.

Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility.

Broekhuijse ML, Šoštarić E, Feitsma H, Gadella BM.

J Anim Sci. 2012 Mar;90(3):779-89. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4311. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

PMID:
22064743
3.

Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments.

Amann RP, Waberski D.

Theriogenology. 2014 Jan 1;81(1):5-17.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.004. Review.

PMID:
24274405
4.

Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in two different portions of the boar ejaculate and its relation to postthaw quality.

Peña FJ, Saravia F, García-Herreros M, Núñez-martínez I, Tapia JA, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Rodríguez-Martínez H.

J Androl. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(6):716-23.

5.

Effect of sexual steroids on boar kinematic sperm subpopulations.

Ayala EME, Aragón MA.

Cytometry A. 2017 Nov;91(11):1096-1103. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23246. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

PMID:
28940889
6.

Sperm subpopulations in Iberian red deer epididymal sperm and their changes through the cryopreservation process.

Martinez-Pastor F, Garcia-Macias V, Alvarez M, Herraez P, Anel L, de Paz P.

Biol Reprod. 2005 Feb;72(2):316-27. Epub 2004 Sep 22.

PMID:
15385419
7.

Differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different semen-processing techniques.

Parrilla I, del Olmo D, Sijses L, Martinez-Alborcia MJ, Cuello C, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2012 May;132(1-2):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

PMID:
22554791
8.

Standardization of computer-assisted semen analysis using an e-learning application.

Ehlers J, Behr M, Bollwein H, Beyerbach M, Waberski D.

Theriogenology. 2011 Aug;76(3):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.02.021. Epub 2011 May 6.

PMID:
21529919
9.

A three-step statistical procedure to identify sperm kinematic subpopulations in canine ejaculates: changes after cryopreservation.

Núñez-Martínez I, Moran JM, Peña FJ.

Reprod Domest Anim. 2006 Oct;41(5):408-15.

PMID:
16984346
10.

Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen.

Gil MC, García-Herreros M, Barón FJ, Aparicio IM, Santos AJ, García-Marín LJ.

Theriogenology. 2009 Jan 15;71(2):254-63. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

PMID:
18760833
11.
12.
13.

Statistical Series: Opportunities and challenges of sperm motility subpopulation analysis.

Martínez-Pastor F, Tizado EJ, Garde JJ, Anel L, de Paz P.

Theriogenology. 2011 Mar 15;75(5):783-95. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.11.034. Epub 2011 Jan 8. Review.

14.

Development of an in vitro index to characterize fertilizing capacity of boar ejaculates.

Schulze M, Ruediger K, Mueller K, Jung M, Well C, Reissmann M.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2013 Jul;140(1-2):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 May 25.

PMID:
23773327
15.

Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress.

Sutkeviciene N, Andersson MA, Zilinskas H, Andersson M.

Theriogenology. 2005 Feb;63(3):739-47.

PMID:
15629793
16.

Effects of repeated electroejaculations on kinematic sperm subpopulations and quality markers of Mexican creole goats.

Vázquez AJ, Cedillo MJ, Quezada VJ, Rivas AC, Morales EC, Ayala EM, Hernández MJ, González RA, Aragón MA.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2015 Mar;154:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

17.

Different computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) systems highly influence sperm motility parameters.

Boryshpolets S, Kowalski RK, Dietrich GJ, Dzyuba B, Ciereszko A.

Theriogenology. 2013 Oct 15;80(7):758-65. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

PMID:
23932168
18.

Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Florida goats.

Dorado J, Molina I, Muñoz-Serrano A, Hidalgo M.

Theriogenology. 2010 Sep 15;74(5):795-804. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Jul 31.

PMID:
20673991
19.

Computer-assisted semen analysis and its utility for profiling boar semen samples.

Didion BA.

Theriogenology. 2008 Nov;70(8):1374-6. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.014. Epub 2008 Aug 23.

PMID:
18723215
20.

Do different portions of the boar ejaculate vary in their ability to sustain cryopreservation?

Peña FJ, Saravia F, Núñez-Martínez I, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Rodriguez Martinez H.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Jun;93(1-2):101-13. Epub 2005 Aug 9.

PMID:
16084673

Supplemental Content

Support Center