Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Starlings uphold principles of economic rationality for delay and probability of reward.

Monteiro T, Vasconcelos M, Kacelnik A.

Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 6;280(1756):20122386. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2386. Print 2013 Apr 7.

2.

State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice.

Schuck-Paim C, Pompilio L, Kacelnik A.

PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e402. Epub 2004 Nov 23.

3.

The ecological rationality of state-dependent valuation.

McNamara JM, Trimmer PC, Houston AI.

Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan;119(1):114-9. doi: 10.1037/a0025958. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

PMID:
22022832
4.

Context-dependent preferences in starlings: linking ecology, foraging and choice.

Vasconcelos M, Monteiro T, Kacelnik A.

PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e64934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064934. Print 2013.

5.

Simultaneous and sequential choice as a function of reward delay and magnitude: normative, descriptive and process-based models tested in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Shapiro MS, Siller S, Kacelnik A.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):75-93. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.75.

PMID:
18248116
6.

Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences.

Latty T, Beekman M.

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 22;278(1703):307-12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1045. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

7.

Natural selection can favour 'irrational' behaviour.

McNamara JM, Trimmer PC, Houston AI.

Biol Lett. 2014 Jan 15;10(1):20130935. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0935. Print 2014 Jan.

8.

Cognitive mechanisms of risky choice: is there an evaluation cost?

Aw J, Monteiro T, Vasconcelos M, Kacelnik A.

Behav Processes. 2012 Feb;89(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

PMID:
22001371
9.

Preference for oddity: uniqueness heuristic or hierarchical choice process?

Waite TA.

Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):707-13. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0162-3. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

PMID:
18528719
10.

Optimal behaviour can violate the principle of regularity.

Trimmer PC.

Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 5;280(1763):20130858. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0858. Print 2013 Jul 22.

11.

Choice in multi-alternative environments: a trial-by-trial implementation of the sequential choice model.

Vasconcelos M, Monteiro T, Aw J, Kacelnik A.

Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.11.010. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

PMID:
19948210
12.

Context-dependent utility overrides absolute memory as a determinant of choice.

Pompilio L, Kacelnik A.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):508-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907250107. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

13.

Risk sensitivity for amounts of and delay to rewards: adaptation for uncertainty or by-product of reward rate maximising?

Shapiro MS, Schuck-Paim C, Kacelnik A.

Behav Processes. 2012 Feb;89(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.08.016. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

PMID:
21925575
14.

Why we should use animals to study economic decision making - a perspective.

Kalenscher T, van Wingerden M.

Front Neurosci. 2011 Jun 17;5:82. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00082. eCollection 2011.

15.

Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'.

Brilot BO, Asher L, Bateson M.

Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):721-31. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0323-z. Epub 2010 May 13.

PMID:
20464439
16.

Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making.

Tsetsos K, Moran R, Moreland J, Chater N, Usher M, Summerfield C.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 15;113(11):3102-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519157113. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

17.

Rational choice, context dependence, and the value of information in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Freidin E, Kacelnik A.

Science. 2011 Nov 18;334(6058):1000-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1209626.

18.

Transitivity of preferences.

Regenwetter M, Dana J, Davis-Stober CP.

Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):42-56. doi: 10.1037/a0021150.

PMID:
21244185
19.

Sequential and simultaneous choices: testing the diet selection and sequential choice models.

Freidin E, Aw J, Kacelnik A.

Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.001.

PMID:
20522312
20.

Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making?

Cohen BJ.

Med Decis Making. 1996 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-6.

PMID:
8717589

Supplemental Content

Support Center