Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 143

1.

Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance.

Li H, Sahoo N, Poenisch F, Suzuki K, Li Y, Li X, Zhang X, Lee AK, Gillin MT, Zhu XR.

Med Phys. 2013 Feb;40(2):021703. doi: 10.1118/1.4773312.

2.

Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.

Whitaker TJ, Beltran C, Tryggestad E, Bues M, Kruse JJ, Remmes NB, Tasson A, Herman MG.

Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):081703. doi: 10.1118/1.4885961.

PMID:
25086513
3.

Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.

Yu J, Beltran CJ, Herman MG.

Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):081706. doi: 10.1118/1.4885956.

PMID:
25086516
4.

Technical Note: Spot characteristic stability for proton pencil beam scanning.

Chen CC, Chang C, Moyers MF, Gao M, Mah D.

Med Phys. 2016 Feb;43(2):777-82. doi: 10.1118/1.4939663.

PMID:
26843240
5.

Assessing the quality of proton PBS treatment delivery using machine log files: comprehensive analysis of clinical treatments delivered at PSI Gantry 2.

Scandurra D, Albertini F, van der Meer R, Meier G, Weber DC, Bolsi A, Lomax A.

Phys Med Biol. 2016 Feb 7;61(3):1171-81. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/3/1171. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

PMID:
26767316
6.

Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston.

Gillin MT, Sahoo N, Bues M, Ciangaru G, Sawakuchi G, Poenisch F, Arjomandy B, Martin C, Titt U, Suzuki K, Smith AR, Zhu XR.

Med Phys. 2010 Jan;37(1):154-63.

PMID:
20175477
7.

Impacts of gantry angle dependent scanning beam properties on proton PBS treatment.

Lin Y, Clasie B, Lu HM, Flanz J, Shen T, Jee KW.

Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jan 21;62(2):344-357. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5084. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

PMID:
27997378
8.

Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality.

Zhu XR, Sahoo N, Zhang X, Robertson D, Li H, Choi S, Lee AK, Gillin MT.

Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):1210-9.

9.

Effects of minimum monitor unit threshold on spot scanning proton plan quality.

Howard M, Beltran C, Mayo CS, Herman MG.

Med Phys. 2014 Sep;41(9):091703. doi: 10.1118/1.4892057.

PMID:
25186378
10.

Improving spot-scanning proton therapy patient specific quality assurance with HPlusQA, a second-check dose calculation engine.

Mackin D, Li Y, Taylor MB, Kerr M, Holmes C, Sahoo N, Poenisch F, Li H, Lii J, Amos R, Wu R, Suzuki K, Gillin MT, Zhu XR, Zhang X.

Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):121708. doi: 10.1118/1.4828775.

PMID:
24320494
11.

A treatment planning study to assess the feasibility of laser-driven proton therapy using a compact gantry design.

Hofmann KM, Masood U, Pawelke J, Wilkens JJ.

Med Phys. 2015 Sep;42(9):5120-9. doi: 10.1118/1.4927717.

PMID:
26328963
12.

Patient-specific quality assurance method for VMAT treatment delivery.

Schreibmann E, Dhabaan A, Elder E, Fox T.

Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4530-5.

PMID:
19928084
13.

Variations in proton scanned beam dose delivery due to uncertainties in magnetic beam steering.

Peterson S, Polf J, Ciangaru G, Frank SJ, Bues M, Smith A.

Med Phys. 2009 Aug;36(8):3693-702.

PMID:
19746802
14.

Quantitative analysis of treatment process time and throughput capacity for spot scanning proton therapy.

Suzuki K, Palmer MB, Sahoo N, Zhang X, Poenisch F, Mackin DS, Liu AY, Wu R, Zhu XR, Frank SJ, Gillin MT, Lee AK.

Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):3975. doi: 10.1118/1.4952731.

PMID:
27370116
15.

Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.

Agnew CE, King RB, Hounsell AR, McGarry CK.

Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):6761-77. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/6761. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

PMID:
23032423
16.

A patient-specific aperture system with an energy absorber for spot scanning proton beams: Verification for clinical application.

Yasui K, Toshito T, Omachi C, Kibe Y, Hayashi K, Shibata H, Tanaka K, Nikawa E, Asai K, Shimomura A, Kinou H, Isoyama S, Fujii Y, Takayanagi T, Hirayama S, Nagamine Y, Shibamoto Y, Komori M, Mizoe JE.

Med Phys. 2015 Dec;42(12):6999-7010. doi: 10.1118/1.4935528.

PMID:
26632055
17.

The evaluation of a 2D diode array in "magic phantom" for use in high dose rate brachytherapy pretreatment quality assurance.

Espinoza A, Petasecca M, Fuduli I, Howie A, Bucci J, Corde S, Jackson M, Lerch ML, Rosenfeld AB.

Med Phys. 2015 Feb;42(2):663-673. doi: 10.1118/1.4905233.

PMID:
28102606
18.

Dosimetric commissioning and quality assurance of scanned ion beams at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy.

Mirandola A, Molinelli S, Vilches Freixas G, Mairani A, Gallio E, Panizza D, Russo S, Ciocca M, Donetti M, Magro G, Giordanengo S, Orecchia R.

Med Phys. 2015 Sep;42(9):5287-300. doi: 10.1118/1.4928397.

PMID:
26328978
19.

RapidArc patient specific mechanical delivery accuracy under extreme mechanical limits using linac log files.

Wijesooriya K, Aliotta E, Benedict S, Read P, Rich T, Larner J.

Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1846-53. doi: 10.1118/1.3690464.

PMID:
22482606
20.

The evaluation of a 2D diode array in “magic phantom” for use in high dose rate brachytherapy pretreatment quality assurance.

Espinoza A, Petasecca M, Fuduli I, Howie A, Bucci J, Corde S, Jackson M, Lerch ML, Rosenfelda AB.

Med Phys. 2015 Feb;42(2):663-73.

PMID:
25771556

Supplemental Content

Support Center