Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Understanding the structure and mechanism of formation of a new magnetic microbubble formulation.

Owen J, Zhou B, Rademeyer P, Tang MX, Pankhurst Q, Eckersley R, Stride E.

Theranostics. 2012;2(12):1127-39. doi: 10.7150/thno.4307. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

2.

Mechanical and dynamic characteristics of encapsulated microbubbles coupled by magnetic nanoparticles as multifunctional imaging and drug delivery agents.

Guo G, Lu L, Yin L, Tu J, Guo X, Wu J, Xu D, Zhang D.

Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 21;59(22):6729-47. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/6729. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

PMID:
25327566
3.

Passive acoustic mapping of magnetic microbubbles for cavitation enhancement and localization.

Crake C, Victor Mde S, Owen J, Coviello C, Collin J, Coussios CC, Stride E.

Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jan 21;60(2):785-806. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/785. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

PMID:
25564961
4.

A versatile method for the preparation of particle-loaded microbubbles for multimodality imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Owen J, Crake C, Lee JY, Carugo D, Beguin E, Khrapitchev AA, Browning RJ, Sibson N, Stride E.

Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2017 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s13346-017-0366-7. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28299722
5.

Magnetic and acoustically active microbubbles loaded with nucleic acids for gene delivery.

Vlaskou D, Plank C, Mykhaylyk O.

Methods Mol Biol. 2013;948:205-41. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-140-0_15.

PMID:
23070773
6.

Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles.

Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG.

Eur J Radiol. 1998 May;27 Suppl 2:S157-60. Review.

PMID:
9652516
7.

Enhancement of microbubble mediated gene delivery by simultaneous exposure to ultrasonic and magnetic fields.

Stride E, Porter C, Prieto AG, Pankhurst Q.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 May;35(5):861-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.11.010. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

PMID:
19282096
8.

Investigation of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets as an ultrasound contrast agent.

Reznik N, Williams R, Burns PN.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Aug;37(8):1271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.001.

PMID:
21723449
9.

Magnetic targeting and ultrasound mediated drug delivery: benefits, limitations and combination.

Owen J, Pankhurst Q, Stride E.

Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28(4):362-73. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2012.668639. Review.

PMID:
22621737
10.

Site directed vascular gene delivery in vivo by ultrasonic destruction of magnetic nanoparticle coated microbubbles.

Mannell H, Pircher J, Fochler F, Stampnik Y, Räthel T, Gleich B, Plank C, Mykhaylyk O, Dahmani C, Wörnle M, Ribeiro A, Pohl U, Krötz F.

Nanomedicine. 2012 Nov;8(8):1309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

PMID:
22480917
11.

New doxorubicin-loaded phospholipid microbubbles for targeted tumor therapy: Part I--Formulation development and in-vitro characterization.

Tinkov S, Winter G, Coester C, Bekeredjian R.

J Control Release. 2010 Apr 2;143(1):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.12.026. Epub 2010 Jan 11.

PMID:
20060861
12.

Technique for the Characterization of Phospholipid Microbubbles Coatings by Transmission Electron Microscopy.

Owen J, Stride E.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Dec;41(12):3253-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.07.024. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

13.

Observing ultrasound stimulated microbubble dynamics at MHz framing rates.

Prentice PA, Campbell PA.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:4463-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650202.

PMID:
19163705
14.

The onset of microbubble vibration.

Emmer M, van Wamel A, Goertz DE, de Jong N.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Jun;33(6):941-9. Epub 2007 Apr 23.

PMID:
17451868
15.

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging.

Yang F, Li Y, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Wu J, Gu N.

Biomaterials. 2009 Aug;30(23-24):3882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.051. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

PMID:
19395082
16.

Modeling non-spherical oscillations and stability of acoustically driven shelled microbubbles.

Loughran J, Eckersley RJ, Tang MX.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jun;131(6):4349-57. doi: 10.1121/1.4707479.

PMID:
22712909
17.

Microbubble stability is a major determinant of the efficiency of ultrasound and microbubble mediated in vivo gene transfer.

Alter J, Sennoga CA, Lopes DM, Eckersley RJ, Wells DJ.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jun;35(6):976-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 13.

PMID:
19285783
18.

Theoretical and experimental characterisation of magnetic microbubbles.

Mulvana H, Eckersley RJ, Tang MX, Pankhurst Q, Stride E.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 May;38(5):864-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.027.

19.

Structural changes and imaging signatures of acoustically sensitive microcapsules under ultrasound.

Sridhar-Keralapura M, Thirumalai S, Mobed-Miremadi M.

Ultrasonics. 2013 Jul;53(5):1044-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
23499137
20.

Next generation ultrasound platforms for theranostics.

Oddo L, Cerroni B, Domenici F, Bedini A, Bordi F, Chiessi E, Gerbes S, Paradossi G.

J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017 Apr 1;491:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.030. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

PMID:
28024192

Supplemental Content

Support Center