Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 223

1.

Exploration versus exploitation in polydomous ant colonies.

Cook Z, Franks DW, Robinson EJ.

J Theor Biol. 2013 Apr 21;323:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

PMID:
23380232
2.

Benefits of dispersed central-place foraging: an individual-based model of a polydomous ant colony.

Schmolke A.

Am Nat. 2009 Jun;173(6):772-8. doi: 10.1086/598493.

PMID:
19341351
3.

The Role of Non-Foraging Nests in Polydomous Wood Ant Colonies.

Ellis S, Robinson EJ.

PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0138321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138321. eCollection 2015. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143901.

4.
5.

The role of multiple pheromones in food recruitment by ants.

Dussutour A, Nicolis SC, Shephard G, Beekman M, Sumpter DJ.

J Exp Biol. 2009 Aug;212(Pt 15):2337-48. doi: 10.1242/jeb.029827.

6.

Resource redistribution in polydomous ant nest networks: local or global?

Ellis S, Franks DW, Robinson EJ.

Behav Ecol. 2014 Sep;25(5):1183-1191. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

7.

How to not get stuck-negative feedback due to crowding maintains flexibility in ant foraging.

Czaczkes TJ.

J Theor Biol. 2014 Nov 7;360:172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

PMID:
25034339
8.

The effects of colony structure and resource abundance on food dispersal in Tapinoma sessile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

VanWeelden MT, Bennett G, Buczkowski G.

J Insect Sci. 2015 Feb 16;15:176. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu176. Print 2015.

9.

An agent-based model to investigate the roles of attractive and repellent pheromones in ant decision making during foraging.

Robinson EJ, Ratnieks FL, Holcombe M.

J Theor Biol. 2008 Nov 21;255(2):250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.08.015. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

PMID:
18778716
10.

Ant foraging on complex trails: route learning and the role of trail pheromones in Lasius niger.

Czaczkes TJ, Grüter C, Ellis L, Wood E, Ratnieks FL.

J Exp Biol. 2013 Jan 15;216(Pt 2):188-97. doi: 10.1242/jeb.076570. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

11.

The effects of colony structure and resource abundance on food dispersal in Tapinoma sessile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Van Weelden MT, Bennett G, Buczkowski G.

J Insect Sci. 2015 Apr 15;15. pii: 46. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iev011. Print 2015. Retraction in: J Insect Sci. 2015;15. pii: 91. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iev074.

12.

Recruitment strategies and colony size in ants.

Planqué R, van den Berg JB, Franks NR.

PLoS One. 2010 Aug 4;5(8):e11664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011664.

13.

Strength in numbers: large and permanent colonies have higher queen oviposition rates in the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile, Mayr).

Abril S, Gómez C.

J Insect Physiol. 2014 Mar;62:21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

PMID:
24462573
14.

The dynamics of foraging trails in the tropical arboreal ant Cephalotes goniodontus.

Gordon DM.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050472. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

15.

The regulation of ant colony foraging activity without spatial information.

Prabhakar B, Dektar KN, Gordon DM.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(8):e1002670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002670. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

16.

Polydomy in the ant Ectatomma opaciventre.

Tofolo VC, Giannotti E, Neves EF, Andrade LH, Lima SM, Súarez YR, Antonialli-Junior WF.

J Insect Sci. 2014 Feb 10;14:21. doi: 10.1093/jis/14.1.21.

PMID:
25373168
17.

Nest- and colony-mate recognition in polydomous colonies of meat ants (Iridomyrmex purpureus).

van Wilgenburg E, Ryan D, Morrison P, Marriott PJ, Elgar MA.

Naturwissenschaften. 2006 Jul;93(7):309-14. Epub 2006 Mar 23.

PMID:
16555093
18.

How patrollers set foraging direction in harvester ants.

Greene MJ, Gordon DM.

Am Nat. 2007 Dec;170(6):943-8. doi: 10.1086/522843.

PMID:
18171176
19.

Foraging arena size and structural complexity affect the dynamics of food distribution in ant colonies.

Buczkowski G, VanWeelden M.

Environ Entomol. 2010 Dec;39(6):1936-42. doi: 10.1603/EN10148.

PMID:
22182560
20.

Optimality of collective choices: a stochastic approach.

Nicolis SC, Detrain C, Demolin D, Deneubourg JL.

Bull Math Biol. 2003 Sep;65(5):795-808.

PMID:
12909251

Supplemental Content

Support Center