Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102


Use of cardiac CT angiography imaging in an epidemiology study - the Methodology of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study cardiovascular disease substudy.

Hacıoğlu Y, Gupta M, Choi TY, George RT, Deible CR, Jacobson LP, Witt MD, Palella FJ, Post WS, Budoff MJ.

Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2013 May;13(3):207-14. doi: 10.5152/akd.2013.065. Epub 2013 Jan 30.


Contrast material and radiation dose reduction strategy for triple-rule-out cardiac CT angiography: feasibility study of non-ECG-gated low kVp scan of the whole chest following coronary CT angiography.

Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S, Namimoto T, Nozaki T, Sakaino N, Harada K, Yamashita Y.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Dec;55(10):1186-96. doi: 10.1177/0284185113514886. Epub 2013 Dec 5.


Radiation dose exposure of patients undergoing 320-row cardiac CT for assessing coronary angiography and global left ventricular function.

Chen CM, Liu YC, Chen CC, Wen MS, Hung CF, Wan YL.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28 Suppl 1:1-5. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0065-x. Epub 2012 May 18.


Post-CABG coronary CT angiography: radiation dose and graft image quality in retrospective versus prospective ECG gating.

Chazen JL, Prince MR, Yip R, Min JK, Weinsaft JW, Henschke CI, Cham MD.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 12.


Safety and accuracy of dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography in the pediatric population.

Han BK, Lindberg J, Overman D, Schwartz RS, Grant K, Lesser JR.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug;6(4):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Jun 5.


A prospective randomized controlled trial to assess the diagnostic performance of reduced tube voltage for coronary CT angiography.

Leipsic J, LaBounty TM, Mancini GB, Heilbron B, Taylor C, Johnson MA, Hague C, Earls JP, Ajlan A, Min JK.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Apr;196(4):801-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5786.


Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.

Qin J, Liu LY, Meng XC, Zhang JS, Dong YX, Fang Y, Shan H.

Clin Imaging. 2011 May-Jun;35(3):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.002.


Coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for near-term quality of life, cost and radiation exposure: a prospective multicenter randomized pilot trial.

Min JK, Koduru S, Dunning AM, Cole JH, Hines JL, Greenwell D, Biga C, Fanning G, LaBounty TM, Gomez M, Horowitz JM, Hadimitzsky M, Hausleiter J, Callister TQ, Rosanski AR, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Lin FY.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug;6(4):274-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 11.


Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction.

Hell MM, Bittner D, Schuhbaeck A, Muschiol G, Brand M, Lell M, Uder M, Achenbach S, Marwan M.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Nov-Dec;8(6):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.


Coronary calcium scans and radiation exposure in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Messenger B, Li D, Nasir K, Carr JJ, Blankstein R, Budoff MJ.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;32(3):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0799-3. Epub 2015 Oct 29.


High-pitch thoracic CT with simultaneous assessment of coronary arteries: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

Scharf M, Bink R, May MS, Hentschke C, Achenbach S, Uder M, Lell MM.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jun;4(6):602-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.014.


Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison.

Yin WH, Lu B, Li N, Han L, Hou ZH, Wu RZ, Wu YJ, Niu HX, Jiang SL, Krazinski AW, Ebersberger U, Meinel FG, Schoepf UJ.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;6(12):1239-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Oct 23.


Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study.

Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Krebs M, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, Schömig A, Hausleiter J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1495-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3543.


Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial.

Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, Catalán-Sanz P, Czermak B, Meyer TS, Hein F, Bischoff B, Kuse M, Schömig A, Achenbach S.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Nov;3(11):1113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.08.016.


Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64).

Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Dewey M, de Roos A, Zankl M, Cantera AC, Artells MS.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):1126-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3983.


Diagnostic accuracy of sub-mSv prospective ECG-triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease.

Gao W, Zhong YM, Sun AM, Wang Q, Ouyang RZ, Hu LW, Qiu HS, Wang SY, Li JY.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;32(6):991-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0854-8. Epub 2016 Feb 20.


Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.

Hausleiter J, Meyer TS, Martuscelli E, Spagnolo P, Yamamoto H, Carrascosa P, Anger T, Lehmkuhl L, Alkadhi H, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Hein F, Bischoff B, Kuse M, Schömig A, Achenbach S.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 May;5(5):484-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.12.017.


Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose.

Menke J, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Staab W, Sohns JM, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Schwarz A.

Am Heart J. 2013 Feb;165(2):154-63.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Nov 26. Review.


Supplemental Content

Support Center