Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 199

1.

Does life history shape sexual size dimorphism in anurans? A comparative analysis.

Han X, Fu J.

BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Jan 31;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-27.

2.

The evolution of fecundity is associated with female body size but not female-biased sexual size dimorphism among frogs.

Monroe MJ, South SH, Alonzo SH.

J Evol Biol. 2015 Oct;28(10):1793-803. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12695. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

3.

Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparative study on Galliform birds.

Kolm N, Stein RW, Mooers AØ, Verspoor JJ, Cunningham EJ.

J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):627-38.

4.

Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.

Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Székely T.

J Evol Biol. 2009 Sep;22(9):1895-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01802.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

5.

Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch's rule.

Liao WB, Zeng Y, Zhou CQ, Jehle R.

Front Zool. 2013 Mar 9;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-10.

6.

Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).

Liao WB, Liu WC, Merilä J.

Oecologia. 2015 Feb;177(2):389-99. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3147-8. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

PMID:
25407623
7.

Geographic variation of life-history traits in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: testing Darwin's fecundity-advantage hypothesis.

Roitberg ES, Eplanova GV, Kotenko TI, Amat F, Carretero MA, Kuranova VN, Bulakhova NA, Zinenko OI, Yakovlev VA.

J Evol Biol. 2015 Mar;28(3):613-29. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12594. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

8.

Sexual size dimorphism in caecilian amphibians: analysis, review and directions for future research.

Kupfer A.

Zoology (Jena). 2009;112(5):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 May 9. Review.

PMID:
19433349
9.

A test of Rensch's rule in greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) with female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

Wu H, Jiang T, Huang X, Lin H, Wang H, Wang L, Niu H, Feng J.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e86085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086085. eCollection 2014.

10.

Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch's rule in Odonata.

Serrano-Meneses MA, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Azpilicueta-Amorín M, González-Soriano E, Székely T.

J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1259-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01567.x. Epub 2008 Jul 11.

11.

Size-dependent selective mechanisms on males and females and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in frogs.

Nali RC, Zamudio KR, Haddad CF, Prado CP.

Am Nat. 2014 Dec;184(6):727-40. doi: 10.1086/678455. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

PMID:
25438173
12.

A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards.

Cox RM, Skelly SL, John-Alder HB.

Evolution. 2003 Jul;57(7):1653-69.

PMID:
12940368
13.

Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.

Cheng RC, Kuntner M.

Evolution. 2014 Oct;68(10):2861-72. doi: 10.1111/evo.12504. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

PMID:
25130435
14.

Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in New World pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae).

Hendry CR, Guiher TJ, Pyron RA.

J Evol Biol. 2014 Apr;27(4):760-71. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12349. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

15.

Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.

Herczeg G, Gonda A, Merilä J.

J Anim Ecol. 2010 May;79(3):581-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01665.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

PMID:
20202005
16.
17.

Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence.

Stephens PR, Wiens JJ.

Evolution. 2009 Apr;63(4):910-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00597.x. Epub 2009 Jan 2.

PMID:
19210531
18.

Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis.

Corl A, Davis AR, Kuchta SR, Comendant T, Sinervo B.

Evolution. 2010 Jan;64(1):79-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00791.x. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

PMID:
19659598
19.

Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa.

De Lisle SP, Rowe L.

Am Nat. 2013 Nov;182(5):630-9. doi: 10.1086/673282. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

PMID:
24107370
20.

Lack of support for Rensch's rule in an intraspecific test using red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) populations.

Martin OY, Michalczyk Ł, Millard AL, Emerson BC, Gage MJ.

Insect Sci. 2017 Feb;24(1):133-140. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12272. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

PMID:
26299521

Supplemental Content

Support Center