Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 86

1.

A low-cost intracellular delivery system based on microbubble and high gravity field.

He C, Gu Q, Huang M, Yang X, Xing J, Chen J.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:2424-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346453.

PMID:
23366414
2.

Light-induced microbubble poration of localized cells.

Fan Q, Hu W, Ohta AT.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:4482-5. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610542.

PMID:
24110729
3.

Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis.

De Cock I, Zagato E, Braeckmans K, Luan Y, de Jong N, De Smedt SC, Lentacker I.

J Control Release. 2015 Jan 10;197:20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.031. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

PMID:
25449801
4.

Mechanisms of the ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery of liposomes and dextrans.

Afadzi M, Strand SP, Nilssen EA, Måsøy SE, Johansen TF, Hansen R, Angelsen BA, de L Davies C.

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Jan;60(1):21-33. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2534.

PMID:
23287910
5.

High Efficiency Molecular Delivery with Sequential Low-Energy Sonoporation Bursts.

Song KH, Fan AC, Brlansky JT, Trudeau T, Gutierrez-Hartmann A, Calvisi ML, Borden MA.

Theranostics. 2015 Oct 18;5(12):1419-27. doi: 10.7150/thno.13033. eCollection 2015.

6.

Biomolecule delivery into canola protoplasts by centrifuging cells with microbubbles.

He C, Gu Q, Huang M, Xing J, Chen J.

FEBS Lett. 2013 Jan 31;587(3):285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.12.005. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

7.

Efficient single-cell poration by microsecond laser pulses.

Fan Q, Hu W, Ohta AT.

Lab Chip. 2015 Jan 21;15(2):581-8. doi: 10.1039/c4lc00943f.

8.

Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation.

Meijering BD, Juffermans LJ, van Wamel A, Henning RH, Zuhorn IS, Emmer M, Versteilen AM, Paulus WJ, van Gilst WH, Kooiman K, de Jong N, Musters RJ, Deelman LE, Kamp O.

Circ Res. 2009 Mar 13;104(5):679-87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.183806. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

9.

Shock wave-mediated molecular delivery into cells.

Kodama T, Doukas AG, Hamblin MR.

Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002 Jan 30;1542(1-3):186-94.

10.

Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension: clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake.

Karshafian R, Samac S, Bevan PD, Burns PN.

Ultrasonics. 2010 Jun;50(7):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

PMID:
20153497
11.

A charge neutral, size tuneable polymersome capable of high biological encapsulation efficiency and cell permeation.

Martin C, Dolmazon E, Moylan K, Fowley C, McHale AP, Callan JF, Callan B.

Int J Pharm. 2015 Mar 15;481(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.061. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

PMID:
25592957
12.

Laser-induced microbubble poration of localized single cells.

Fan Q, Hu W, Ohta AT.

Lab Chip. 2014 May 7;14(9):1572-8. doi: 10.1039/c3lc51394g. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

13.

Effect of WOW process parameters on morphology and burst release of FITC-dextran loaded PLGA microspheres.

Mao S, Xu J, Cai C, Germershaus O, Schaper A, Kissel T.

Int J Pharm. 2007 Apr 4;334(1-2):137-48. Epub 2006 Oct 28.

PMID:
17196348
14.

Hydrogel-based drug delivery systems: comparison of drug diffusivity and release kinetics.

Brandl F, Kastner F, Gschwind RM, Blunk T, Tessmar J, Göpferich A.

J Control Release. 2010 Mar 3;142(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.030. Epub 2009 Nov 1.

PMID:
19887092
15.

Release of a macromolecular drug from alginate-impregnated microspheres.

Chretien C, Chaumeil JC.

Int J Pharm. 2005 Nov 4;304(1-2):18-28. Epub 2005 Sep 13.

PMID:
16165334
16.

Acetal-derivatized dextran: an acid-responsive biodegradable material for therapeutic applications.

Bachelder EM, Beaudette TT, Broaders KE, Dashe J, Fréchet JM.

J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Aug 13;130(32):10494-5. doi: 10.1021/ja803947s. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

17.

Two complementary approaches for intracellular delivery of exogenous enzymes.

Rust A, Hassan HH, Sedelnikova S, Niranjan D, Hautbergue G, Abbas SA, Partridge L, Rice D, Binz T, Davletov B.

Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 24;5:12444. doi: 10.1038/srep12444.

18.

Development of a tumor tissue-mimicking model with endothelial cell layer and collagen gel for evaluating drug penetration.

Sasaki N, Bos C, Escoffre JM, Storm G, Moonen C.

Int J Pharm. 2015 Mar 30;482(1-2):118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.01.039. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

PMID:
25617677
19.

Matrix-loaded biodegradable gelatin nanoparticles as new approach to improve drug loading and delivery.

Ofokansi K, Winter G, Fricker G, Coester C.

Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010 Sep;76(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

PMID:
20420904
20.

A fluorescence-based glucose biosensor using concanavalin A and dextran encapsulated in a poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel.

Russell RJ, Pishko MV, Gefrides CC, McShane MJ, Coté GL.

Anal Chem. 1999 Aug 1;71(15):3126-32.

PMID:
10450158

Supplemental Content

Support Center