Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 79

1.

Quantitative volumetric breast imaging with 3D inverse scatter computed tomography.

André M, Wiskin J, Borup D, Johnson S, Ojeda-Fournier H, Olson L.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:1110-3. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346129.

PMID:
23366090
2.

Automated quantitative volumetric breast ultrasound data-acquisition system.

Shipley JA, Duck FA, Goddard DA, Hillman MR, Halliwell M, Jones MG, Thomas BT.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005 Jul;31(7):905-17.

PMID:
15972196
3.

Breast ultrasound tomography versus MRI for clinical display of anatomy and tumor rendering: preliminary results.

Ranger B, Littrup PJ, Duric N, Chandiwala-Mody P, Li C, Schmidt S, Lupinacci J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan;198(1):233-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6910.

4.

Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration.

Hopp T, Duric N, Ruiter NV.

Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015 Mar;40:170-81. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

PMID:
25456144
5.

Diagnostic algorithm: how to make use of new 2D, 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies in breast imaging.

Weismann CF, Datz L.

Eur J Radiol. 2007 Nov;64(2):250-7. Epub 2007 Sep 29.

PMID:
17904779
6.

Imaging of sound speed using reflection ultrasound tomography.

Nebeker J, Nelson TR.

J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Sep;31(9):1389-404.

PMID:
22922619
7.

Comparison between different imaging techniques in the evaluation of malignant breast lesions: can 3D ultrasound be useful?

Clauser P, Londero V, Como G, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C.

Radiol Med. 2014 Apr;119(4):240-8. doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0338-z. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

PMID:
24297584
8.

Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner.

Zhang J, Lai XJ, Zhu QL, Wang HY, Jiang YX, Liu H, Dai Q, You SS, Xiao MS, Sun Q.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

PMID:
21724355
9.

Ultrasound computed tomography in breast imaging: first clinical results of a custom-made scanner.

Hollenhorst M, Hansen C, Hüttebräuker N, Schasse A, Heuser L, Ermert H, Schulte-Altedorneburg G.

Ultraschall Med. 2010 Dec;31(6):604-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245506. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

PMID:
20614411
10.

In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.

Li C, Duric N, Littrup P, Huang L.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Oct;35(10):1615-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

11.

Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound.

Kotsianos-Hermle D, Hiltawsky KM, Wirth S, Fischer T, Friese K, Reiser M.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jul;71(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 12.

PMID:
18468829
12.

Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.

Sahiner B, Chan HP, Roubidoux MA, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Paramagul C, Bailey J, Nees AV, Blane C.

Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):716-24. Epub 2007 Jan 23.

13.

Imaging results of multi-modal ultrasound computerized tomography system designed for breast diagnosis.

Opieliński KJ, Pruchnicki P, Gudra T, Podgórski P, Kurcz J, Kraśnicki T, Sąsiadek M, Majewski J.

Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015 Dec;46 Pt 2:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

PMID:
25759234
14.

Ultrasonic computed tomography reconstruction of the attenuation coefficient using a linear array.

Huang SW, Li PC.

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Nov;52(11):2011-22.

PMID:
16422413
15.

Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography.

Wiskin J, Borup DT, Johnson SA, Berggren M.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 May;131(5):3802-13. doi: 10.1121/1.3699240.

16.

Non-rigid registration of three-dimensional (3D) grayscale and Doppler ultrasound breast images.

Narayanasamy G, LeCarpentier GL, Zabuawala S, Fowlkes JB, Roubidoux M, Sinha S, Carson PL.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:91-4.

PMID:
18001896
17.

[Ultrasound examination of the female breast: comparison of 7.5 and 13 MHz].

Schlecht L, Hadijuana J, Hosten N, Oellinger H, Minguillon C, Lichtenegger W, Felix R.

Aktuelle Radiol. 1996 Mar;6(2):69-73. German.

PMID:
8679727
18.

Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.

Chen L, Chen Y, Diao XH, Fang L, Pang Y, Cheng AQ, Li WP, Wang Y.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Oct;39(10):1735-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

PMID:
23849390
19.

Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.

Lin X, Wang J, Han F, Fu J, Li A.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 May;81(5):873-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.038. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

PMID:
21420814
20.

Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study.

Richards MS, Barbone PE, Oberai AA.

Phys Med Biol. 2009 Feb 7;54(3):757-79. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/3/019. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center