Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

European solvent industry group generic exposure scenario risk and exposure tool.

Zaleski RT, Qian H, Zelenka MP, George-Ares A, Money C.

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):27-35. doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.128. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

2.

First tier modeling of consumer dermal exposure to substances in consumer articles under REACH: a quantitative evaluation of the ECETOC TRA for consumers tool.

Delmaar JE, Bokkers BG, ter Burg W, van Engelen JG.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;65(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23159863
3.

Evaluation of recommended REACH exposure modeling tools and near-field, far-field model in assessing occupational exposure to toluene from spray paint.

Hofstetter E, Spencer JW, Hiteshew K, Coutu M, Nealley M.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Mar;57(2):210-20. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes062. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

PMID:
23002273
4.

Generic exposure scenarios: their development, application, and interpretation under REACH.

Money C, Margary A, Noij D, Hommes K.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jun;55(5):451-64. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer022. Epub 2011 May 6.

PMID:
21551289
5.

Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment.

Dellarco M, Zaleski R, Gaborek BJ, Qian H, Bellin CA, Egeghy P, Heard N, Jolliet O, Lander DR, Sunger N, Stylianou KS, Tanir JY.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2017 Apr;47(4):317-341. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1270255. Epub 2017 Feb 10. Review.

PMID:
28266262
6.

Exposure scenarios for workers.

Marquart H, Northage C, Money C.

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 1:S16-25. Epub 2007 Sep 12.

PMID:
17851448
7.

ECETOC Florence workshop on risk assessment of endocrine substances, including the potency concept.

Fegert I.

Toxicol Lett. 2013 Dec 16;223(3):310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.03.027. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

PMID:
23558296
8.

Consumer exposure scenarios: development, challenges and possible solutions.

Van Engelen JG, Heinemeyer G, Rodriguez C.

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 1:S26-33. Epub 2007 May 16.

PMID:
17505503
9.

Assessments of direct human exposure: the approach of EU risk assessments compared to scenario-based risk assessment.

Wormuth M, Demou E, Scheringer M, Hungerbühler K.

Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):979-90.

PMID:
17958505
10.

Human biomonitoring as a pragmatic tool to support health risk management of chemicals--examples under the EU REACH programme.

Boogaard PJ, Hays SM, Aylward LL.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;59(1):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Oct 7.

PMID:
20933039
11.

[Threshold values for chemical agents in the light of the REACH regulation].

Cavallo DM, Cattaneo A, Colosio C, Moretto A, Carrer P, Bartolucci GB.

G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2011 Jul-Sep;33(3 Suppl):439-42. Italian.

12.

Consumer exposure modelling under REACH: Assessing the defaults.

Oltmanns J, Neisel F, Heinemeyer G, Kaiser E, Schneider K.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;72(2):222-30. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

PMID:
25908511
13.

Estimating emissions from adhesives and sealants uses and manufacturing for environmental risk assessments.

Tolls J, Gómez D, Guhl W, Funk T, Seger E, Wind T.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Jan;12(1):185-94. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1662. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

PMID:
25982489
14.

Risk assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics: a European union perspective.

Henkler F, Tralau T, Tentschert J, Kneuer C, Haase A, Platzek T, Luch A, Götz ME.

Arch Toxicol. 2012 Nov;86(11):1641-6. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0944-x. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

15.

Sensitivity analysis, dominant factors, and robustness of the ECETOC TRA v3, Stoffenmanager 4.5, and ART 1.5 occupational exposure models.

Riedmann RA, Gasic B, Vernez D.

Risk Anal. 2015 Feb;35(2):211-25. doi: 10.1111/risa.12286. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

PMID:
25616198
16.

Scenario-based risk assessment of multi-use chemicals: application to solvents.

Scheringer M, Vögl T, von Grote J, Capaul B, Schubert R, Hungerbühler K.

Risk Anal. 2001 Jun;21(3):481-97.

PMID:
11572428
17.

Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern.

Bars R, Fegert I, Gross M, Lewis D, Weltje L, Weyers A, Wheeler JR, Galay-Burgos M.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;64(1):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jun 23.

18.

Default values for assessment of potential dermal exposure of the hands to industrial chemicals in the scope of regulatory risk assessments.

Marquart H, Warren ND, Laitinen J, van Hemmen JJ.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Jul;50(5):469-89. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

PMID:
16540540
19.

[Consumer risk assessment in case of maximum residue levels (MRLs) violations in food].

Struciński P, Góralczyk K, Czaja K, Hernik A, Korcz W, Ludwicki JK.

Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2007;58(2):377-88. Review. Polish.

20.

Modeled comparisons of health risks posed by fluorinated solvents in a workplace spill scenario.

Jayjock M, Logan P, Mader B, Owens J, Eldridge J, Costello M, Morken M, Lieder P.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Mar;55(2):202-13. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq062. Epub 2010 Sep 13.

PMID:
20841319

Supplemental Content

Support Center