Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 117

1.

RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R.

BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-20.

2.

RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R.

J Adv Nurs. 2013 May;69(5):987-1004. doi: 10.1111/jan.12092. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

PMID:
23356699
3.

RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R.

BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21.

4.

RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R.

J Adv Nurs. 2013 May;69(5):1005-22. doi: 10.1111/jan.12095. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

PMID:
23356726
6.

Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).

Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Aug 16;11:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-115.

7.

RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.

Wong G, Westhorp G, Manzano A, Greenhalgh J, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T.

BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1.

8.
9.

Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation.

Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Westhorp G, Pawson R.

BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 3;5(8):e008567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567.

10.
11.

Developing a methodological framework for organisational case studies: a rapid review and consensus development process.

Rodgers M, Thomas S, Harden M, Parker G, Street A, Eastwood A.

Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Jan.

13.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.

Skelly AC, Hashimoto RE, Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Fischer DJ, Wilson JR, Tetreault LA, Fehlings MG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7ebbf.

PMID:
24026148
14.

PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research.

Kapadia MZ, Askie L, Hartling L, Contopoulos-Ioannidis D, Bhutta ZA, Soll R, Moher D, Offringa M.

BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 18;6(4):e010270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010270.

15.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.

Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, Tierney JF; PRISMA-IPD Development Group.

JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3656.

PMID:
25919529
16.

Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, Forbes A.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.

PMID:
25271098
17.

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.

Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E; ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines-CHEERS Good Reporting Practices Task Force.

Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.

18.
20.

Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group.

van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1290-9.

PMID:
12811274

Supplemental Content

Support Center