Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 89

1.

In reply.

Biais M, Ouattara A, Janvier G, Sztark F.

Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):467. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827a303b. No abstract available.

PMID:
23340365
2.

Other factors to consider when deciding whether or not to infuse volume because of arterial blood pressure waveform variation.

Roth JV.

Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):466. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa26. No abstract available.

PMID:
23340364
3.

Case scenario: respiratory variations in arterial pressure for guiding fluid management in mechanically ventilated patients.

Biais M, Ouattara A, Janvier G, Sztark F.

Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1354-61. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318256ee28. No abstract available.

PMID:
22531335
4.

The authors reply.

Liu Y, Li YM.

Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):e305-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001586. No abstract available.

PMID:
27083027
5.

Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: randomised controlled study.

Lee JH, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Gil NS, Hong DM, Kim JH, Kim HJ.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jan;28(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834089cf.

PMID:
21088596
7.

Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.

Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, Wiesenack C.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):555-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1.

PMID:
20035228
8.

Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Yazigi A, Khoury E, Hlais S, Madi-Jebara S, Haddad F, Hayek G, Jabbour K.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):387-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

PMID:
22100211
9.

Ventilation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Are the lungs the problem?

Lyons WS.

Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):463-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
11246337
10.

Cardiopulmonary interactions in acute lung injury.

Schmidt GA.

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 Feb;19(1):51-6. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835c35ac. Review.

PMID:
23201585
11.

[Value of the course of respiratory pressure in evaluating lung function in artificial respiration. 1. Theoretical principles].

Zietz G, Geske R, Pellny B, Bötcher W, Grünewald G, Schädlich M.

Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1986;11(3):169-80. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
3521666
12.

Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis.

Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, Swaraj S, Cowan C, Mostafa SM, Wenstone R, Leuwer M.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Feb;21(2):132-8.

PMID:
14977345
13.

Clinical practice.

Guinot PG, Godart J, de Broca B, Bernard E, Lorne E, Dupont H.

Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):167-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu431. No abstract available.

14.

Care of the infant with the respiratory distress syndrome.

Kumpe M, Kleinman L.

Nurs Clin North Am. 1971 Mar;6(1):25-37. No abstract available.

PMID:
5204952
15.

Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL.

N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75. Epub 2006 May 21.

16.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.

Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, Kao KC, Chen NH, Hsieh MJ, Tsai YH.

Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2810-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b74e.

PMID:
18766099
17.

Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: are the studied indicators of value in the setting of loss and replacement?

Stricker PA, Fiadjoe JE, Jobes DR.

Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):816-7; author's reply 817. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer320. No abstract available.

18.

End-expiratory occlusion test: please use the appropriate tools!

Monnet X, Teboul JL.

Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):166-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu430. No abstract available.

19.

Starling's equation and bedside critical care.

Manthous CA.

J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):354-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 11. Review. No abstract available. Erratum in: J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):607.

PMID:
18725040
20.

Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improved outcomes.

Michard F.

Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):402-3. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318205c0a6. No abstract available.

PMID:
21248521

Supplemental Content

Support Center