Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 83

1.

Social dynamics of science.

Sun X, Kaur J, Milojević S, Flammini A, Menczer F.

Sci Rep. 2013;3:1069. doi: 10.1038/srep01069.

2.

Attack resilience of the evolving scientific collaboration network.

Liu XF, Xu XK, Small M, Tse CK.

PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026271.

3.

Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist.

Shneider AM.

Trends Biochem Sci. 2009 May;34(5):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.02.002.

PMID:
19362484
4.

Biology as technology.

Bayertz K, Nevers P.

Clio Med. 1998;48:108-32.

PMID:
9646019
5.
6.

Molecular evolution: concepts and the origin of disciplines.

Suárez-Díaz E.

Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2009 Mar;40(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.12.006.

PMID:
19268873
7.

"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences.

Fanelli D.

PLoS One. 2010 Apr 7;5(4):e10068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010068.

8.

Understanding interdisciplinary collaborations as social networks.

Haines VA, Godley J, Hawe P.

Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9374-1.

PMID:
21063766
9.

Are opinions based on science: modelling social response to scientific facts.

Iñiguez G, Tagüeña-Martínez J, Kaski KK, Barrio RA.

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042122.

10.

Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science.

Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Bettencourt L, Chute R, Rodriguez MA, Balakireva L.

PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004803.

11.

Community structure and the evolution of interdisciplinarity in Slovenia's scientific collaboration network.

Lužar B, Levnajić Z, Povh J, Perc M.

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e94429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094429.

12.

A code of ethics for the life sciences.

Jones NL.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):25-43.

PMID:
17703607
13.
14.

Unconventional allies: interdisciplinary approaches to science policy and funding.

Goldstein LS.

Trends Cell Biol. 2010 Dec;20(12):695-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.09.008.

PMID:
21106464
15.
16.

The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: a longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004.

Estabrooks CA, Derksen L, Winther C, Lavis JN, Scott SD, Wallin L, Profetto-McGrath J.

Implement Sci. 2008 Nov 13;3:49. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-49.

17.

You say you want an evolution? A role for scientists in science education.

Coalition of Scientific Societies..

Dev Biol. 2008 Apr 1;316(1):2-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.01.021.

18.

Quantifying social group evolution.

Palla G, Barabási AL, Vicsek T.

Nature. 2007 Apr 5;446(7136):664-7.

PMID:
17410175
20.

[Dynamic paradigm in psychopathology: "chaos theory", from physics to psychiatry].

Pezard L, Nandrino JL.

Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):260-8. French.

PMID:
11488256
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center