Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132

1.

Artificial cervical vertebra and intervertebral complex replacement through the anterior approach in animal model: a biomechanical and in vivo evaluation of a successful goat model.

Qin J, He X, Wang D, Qi P, Guo L, Huang S, Cai X, Li H, Wang R.

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052910. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

2.

An in vivo comparison study in goats for a novel motion-preserving cervical joint system.

Qin J, Zhao C, Wang D, Zhao B, Dong J, Li H, Sang R, Wang S, Fu J, Kong R, He X.

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178775. eCollection 2017.

3.

Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.

Sasso RC, Best NM.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.

PMID:
18418131
4.

In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.

Barrey C, Mosnier T, Jund J, Perrin G, Skalli W.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Nov;11(5):538-46. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.SPINE0949.

PMID:
19929355
5.

The Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Disc Replacement: An Ovine Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis.

Yu CC, Hao DJ, Ma YL, Huang DG, Li HK, Feng H, Hou Q.

Med Sci Monit. 2016 May 31;22:1843-9.

6.

Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.

Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Lucke M, Schröder R, Mittlmeier T.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 1;26(9):1028-37.

PMID:
11337621
7.

Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S176-85.

PMID:
14560189
8.

Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, Shin JH, Ju YS.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

9.

In vivo experimental study of hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage (HCIFC).

Gu YT, Yao ZJ, Jia LS, Qi J, Wang J.

Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1251-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0978-8. Epub 2010 Feb 27.

10.

Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.

Park JJ, Quirno M, Cunningham MR, Schwarzkopf R, Bendo JA, Spivak JM, Goldstein JA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):E285-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c88165.

PMID:
20354472
11.
12.

Porous coated motion cervical disc replacement: a biomechanical, histomorphometric, and biologic wear analysis in a caprine model.

Hu N, Cunningham BW, McAfee PC, Kim SW, Sefter JC, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1666-73.

PMID:
16816760
13.

Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.

Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):721-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc.

PMID:
20543765
14.

Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.

Hou Y, Liu Y, Yuan W, Wang X, Chen H, Yang L, Zhang Y.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

PMID:
24076441
15.

Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.

Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC.

Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006.

PMID:
20362252
16.

Reconstruction of Segmental Stability of Goat Cervical Spine with Poly (D, L-lactic acid) Cage.

Li XH, Song YM, Duan H.

Orthop Surg. 2015 Aug;7(3):266-72. doi: 10.1111/os.12192.

PMID:
26311103
17.

A novel total cervical prosthesis for single-level cervical subtotal corpectomy: radiologic and histomorphometric analysis in a caprine model.

Tan QC, Feng YF, Zhang Y, Wu ZX, Ma ZS, Sang HX, Yan YB, Lei W, Zhao X.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Apr;28(3):E166-72. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000202.

PMID:
25353202
18.

Autologous growth factors versus autogenous graft for anterior cervical interbody fusion: an in vivo caprine model.

Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Hu N, McAfee PC.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Aug;13(2):216-23. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09512.

PMID:
20672957
19.

Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.

Powell JW, Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA, Hipp JA.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):89-95. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181991413.

PMID:
20051921
20.

Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.

Balaram AK, Ghanayem AJ, OʼLeary PT, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Abjornson C, Patwardhan AG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):E763-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000344.

PMID:
24732831

Supplemental Content

Support Center