Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 215

1.

PET/MR imaging of the pelvis in the presence of endoprostheses: reducing image artifacts and increasing accuracy through inpainting.

Ladefoged CN, Andersen FL, Keller SH, Löfgren J, Hansen AE, Holm S, Højgaard L, Beyer T.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):594-601. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2316-4. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

PMID:
23296642
2.

Whole-body PET/MRI: the effect of bone attenuation during MR-based attenuation correction in oncology imaging.

Aznar MC, Sersar R, Saabye J, Ladefoged CN, Andersen FL, Rasmussen JH, Löfgren J, Beyer T.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Jul;83(7):1177-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

PMID:
24780817
3.

Dental artifacts in the head and neck region: implications for Dixon-based attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Ladefoged CN, Hansen AE, Keller SH, Fischer BM, Rasmussen JH, Law I, Kjær A, Højgaard L, Lauze F, Beyer T, Andersen FL.

EJNMMI Phys. 2015 Dec;2(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40658-015-0112-5. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

4.

Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone.

Andersen FL, Ladefoged CN, Beyer T, Keller SH, Hansen AE, Højgaard L, Kjær A, Law I, Holm S.

Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.042. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

5.

PET/MRI in the Presence of Metal Implants: Completion of the Attenuation Map from PET Emission Data.

Fuin N, Pedemonte S, Catalano OA, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Soricelli A, Salvatore M, Heberlein K, Hooker JM, Van Leemput K, Catana C.

J Nucl Med. 2017 May;58(5):840-845. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.183343. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

PMID:
28126884
6.

Evaluation and automatic correction of metal-implant-induced artifacts in MR-based attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR imaging.

Schramm G, Maus J, Hofheinz F, Petr J, Lougovski A, Beuthien-Baumann B, Platzek I, van den Hoff J.

Phys Med Biol. 2014 Jun 7;59(11):2713-26. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/11/2713. Epub 2014 May 6.

PMID:
24800752
7.

Clinical assessment of MR-guided 3-class and 4-class attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Arabi H, Rager O, Alem A, Varoquaux A, Becker M, Zaidi H.

Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Apr;17(2):264-76. doi: 10.1007/s11307-014-0777-5.

PMID:
25096328
8.

Correction of quantification errors in pelvic and spinal lesions caused by ignoring higher photon attenuation of bone in [18F]NaF PET/MR.

Schramm G, Maus J, Hofheinz F, Petr J, Lougovski A, Beuthien-Baumann B, Oehme L, Platzek I, van den Hoff J.

Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6468-76. doi: 10.1118/1.4932367.

PMID:
26520736
9.

Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.

Mehranian A, Zaidi H.

J Nucl Med. 2015 Apr;56(4):635-41. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.148817. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

10.

Positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation correction artefacts in PET/CT and PET/MRI.

Buchbender C, Hartung-Knemeyer V, Forsting M, Antoch G, Heusner TA.

Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120570. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120570.

11.

Reproducibility of MRI Dixon-Based Attenuation Correction in Combined PET/MR with Applications for Lean Body Mass Estimation.

Rausch I, Rust P, DiFranco MD, Lassen M, Stadlbauer A, Mayerhoefer ME, Hartenbach M, Hacker M, Beyer T.

J Nucl Med. 2016 Jul;57(7):1096-101. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.168294. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

12.

Segmentation-based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance: erroneous tissue identification and its impact on positron emission tomography interpretation.

Brendle C, Schmidt H, Oergel A, Bezrukov I, Mueller M, Schraml C, Pfannenberg C, la Fougère C, Nikolaou K, Schwenzer N.

Invest Radiol. 2015 May;50(5):339-46. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000131.

PMID:
25585210
13.

Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification.

MacDonald LR, Kohlmyer S, Liu C, Lewellen TK, Kinahan PE.

Med Phys. 2011 Jun;38(6):2948-56.

14.

MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Multiphase Level-Set Method.

An HJ, Seo S, Kang H, Choi H, Cheon GJ, Kim HJ, Lee DS, Song IC, Kim YK, Lee JS.

J Nucl Med. 2016 Apr;57(4):587-93. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163550. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

15.

Multi-Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET Imaging Using a Time-of-Flight PET/MR Scanner: Comparison with Clinical Single-Atlas- and CT-Based Attenuation Correction.

Sekine T, Burgos N, Warnock G, Huellner M, Buck A, Ter Voert EE, Cardoso MJ, Hutton BF, Ourselin S, Veit-Haibach P, Delso G.

J Nucl Med. 2016 Aug;57(8):1258-64. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169045. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

16.

Potential influence of Gadolinium contrast on image segmentation in MR-based attenuation correction with Dixon sequences in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MR.

Ruhlmann V, Heusch P, Kühl H, Beiderwellen K, Antoch G, Forsting M, Bockisch A, Buchbender C, Quick HH.

MAGMA. 2016 Apr;29(2):301-8. doi: 10.1007/s10334-015-0516-1. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

PMID:
26667965
17.

Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.

Seith F, Gatidis S, Schmidt H, Bezrukov I, la Fougère C, Nikolaou K, Pfannenberg C, Schwenzer N.

Invest Radiol. 2016 Jan;51(1):66-71. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000208.

PMID:
26348596
18.

PET attenuation correction using synthetic CT from ultrashort echo-time MR imaging.

Roy S, Wang WT, Carass A, Prince JL, Butman JA, Pham DL.

J Nucl Med. 2014 Dec;55(12):2071-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.143958. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

19.

Dixon Sequence with Superimposed Model-Based Bone Compartment Provides Highly Accurate PET/MR Attenuation Correction of the Brain.

Koesters T, Friedman KP, Fenchel M, Zhan Y, Hermosillo G, Babb J, Jelescu IO, Faul D, Boada FE, Shepherd TM.

J Nucl Med. 2016 Jun;57(6):918-24. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166967. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center