Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 143

1.

Visual discrimination in noise: behavioural correlates of age-related cortical decline.

Arena A, Hutchinson CV, Shimozaki SS, Long MD.

Behav Brain Res. 2013 Apr 15;243:102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.12.039. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

PMID:
23295399
2.

Contrast sensitivity, healthy aging and noise.

Allard R, Renaud J, Molinatti S, Faubert J.

Vision Res. 2013 Nov;92:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

3.

Development of sampling efficiency and internal noise in motion detection and discrimination in school-aged children.

Falkenberg HK, Simpson WA, Dutton GN.

Vision Res. 2014 Jul;100:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

4.

The effects of aging on orientation discrimination.

Betts LR, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ.

Vision Res. 2007 Jun;47(13):1769-80. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

5.

Reduction in direction discrimination with age and slow speed is due to both increased internal noise and reduced sampling efficiency.

Bogfjellmo LG, Bex PJ, Falkenberg HK.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Aug 5;54(8):5204-10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12005.

6.

The role of contrast sensitivity in global motion processing deficits in the elderly.

Allen HA, Hutchinson CV, Ledgeway T, Gayle P.

J Vis. 2010 Aug 17;10(10):15. doi: 10.1167/10.10.15.

PMID:
20884480
7.
8.

A comparison of sampling efficiency and internal noise level in young and old subjects.

Pardhan S, Gilchrist J, Elliott DB, Beh GK.

Vision Res. 1996 Jun;36(11):1641-8.

9.
10.

The effect of aging on the orientational selectivity of the human visual system.

Govenlock SW, Taylor CP, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ.

Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(1):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 22.

11.

Age-related changes in fine motion direction discriminations.

Bocheva N, Angelova D, Stefanova M.

Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(3):257-78. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3559-4. Epub 2013 May 26.

PMID:
23708801
12.

Visual spatial integration in the elderly.

Del Viva MM, Agostini R.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun;48(6):2940-6.

PMID:
17525231
13.

Sources of motion-sensitivity loss in glaucoma.

Falkenberg HK, Bex PJ.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun;48(6):2913-21.

PMID:
17525228
14.

Perceptual learning of motion direction discrimination in fovea: separable mechanisms.

Lu ZL, Chu W, Dosher BA.

Vision Res. 2006 Jul;46(15):2315-27. Epub 2006 Mar 9.

15.

Psychophysical estimation of speed discrimination. II. Aging effects.

Raghuram A, Lakshminarayanan V, Khanna R.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2005 Oct;22(10):2269-80.

PMID:
16277296
16.

Low-level processing deficits underlying poor contrast sensitivity for moving plaids in anisometropic amblyopia.

Tang Y, Chen L, Liu Z, Liu C, Zhou Y.

Vis Neurosci. 2012 Nov;29(6):315-23. doi: 10.1017/S095252381200034X. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

PMID:
23146353
17.

The effect of normal aging on closed contour shape discrimination.

McKendrick AM, Weymouth AE, Battista J.

J Vis. 2010 Feb 4;10(2):1.1-9. doi: 10.1167/10.2.1.

PMID:
20462302
18.

Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.

Lee DK, Itti L, Koch C, Braun J.

Nat Neurosci. 1999 Apr;2(4):375-81.

PMID:
10204546
19.

Impairment in preattentive visual processing in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Lieb K, Brucker S, Bach M, Els T, L├╝cking CH, Greenlee MW.

Brain. 1999 Feb;122 ( Pt 2):303-13.

PMID:
10071058
20.

Using detection or identification paradigms when assessing visual development: is a shift in paradigm necessary?

Hanck J, Cornish K, Perreault A, Kogan C, Bertone A.

J Vis. 2012 Jun 1;12(6):4. doi: 10.1167/12.6.4.

PMID:
22661610

Supplemental Content

Support Center