Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Electrostatic simulations of a local electrode atom probe: the dependence of tomographic reconstruction parameters on specimen and microscope geometry.

Loi ST, Gault B, Ringer SP, Larson DJ, Geiser BP.

Ultramicroscopy. 2013 Sep;132:107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.12.012. Epub 2012 Dec 16.

PMID:
23294557
2.

Advances in the reconstruction of atom probe tomography data.

Gault B, Haley D, de Geuser F, Moody MP, Marquis EA, Larson DJ, Geiser BP.

Ultramicroscopy. 2011 May;111(6):448-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.016. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

PMID:
21146931
3.

Atom probe trajectory mapping using experimental tip shape measurements.

Haley D, Petersen T, Ringer SP, Smith GD.

J Microsc. 2011 Nov;244(2):170-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03522.x. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

4.

A model to predict image formation in Atom probe Tomography.

Vurpillot F, Gaillard A, Da Costa G, Deconihout B.

Ultramicroscopy. 2013 Sep;132:152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.12.007. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

PMID:
23398963
5.

Impact of laser pulsing on the reconstruction in an atom probe tomography.

Gault B, La Fontaine A, Moody MP, Ringer SP, Marquis EA.

Ultramicroscopy. 2010 Aug;110(9):1215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 May 8.

PMID:
20471173
6.

Pulsed-voltage atom probe tomography of low conductivity and insulator materials by application of ultrathin metallic coating on nanoscale specimen geometry.

Adineh VR, Marceau RKW, Chen Y, Si KJ, Velkov T, Cheng W, Li J, Fu J.

Ultramicroscopy. 2017 Oct;181:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 13.

PMID:
28558288
7.

Performance of local electrodes in the local electrode atom probe.

Russell KF, Miller MK, Ulfig RM, Gribb T.

Ultramicroscopy. 2007 Sep;107(9):750-5. Epub 2007 Mar 3.

PMID:
17398008
8.

A low error reconstruction method for confocal holography to determine 3-dimensional properties.

Jacquemin PB, Herring RA.

Ultramicroscopy. 2012 Jun;117:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

PMID:
22634188
9.

Systematic approaches for targeting an atom-probe tomography sample fabricated in a thin TEM specimen: Correlative structural, chemical and 3-D reconstruction analyses.

Baik SI, Isheim D, Seidman DN.

Ultramicroscopy. 2018 Jan;184(Pt A):284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

PMID:
29054043
10.

Pragmatic reconstruction methods in atom probe tomography.

Vurpillot F, Gruber M, Da Costa G, Martin I, Renaud L, Bostel A.

Ultramicroscopy. 2011 Jul;111(8):1286-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Apr 17.

PMID:
21864769
11.

On the use of simulated field-evaporated specimen apex shapes in atom probe tomography data reconstruction.

Larson DJ, Geiser BP, Prosa TJ, Kelly TF.

Microsc Microanal. 2012 Oct;18(5):953-63. doi: 10.1017/S1431927612001523. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

PMID:
23058657
12.

Towards an accurate volume reconstruction in atom probe tomography.

Beinke D, Oberdorfer C, Schmitz G.

Ultramicroscopy. 2016 Jun;165:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

PMID:
27062338
13.

Dynamic reconstruction for atom probe tomography.

Gault B, Loi ST, Araullo-Peters VJ, Stephenson LT, Moody MP, Shrestha SL, Marceau RK, Yao L, Cairney JM, Ringer SP.

Ultramicroscopy. 2011 Nov;111(11):1619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

PMID:
21946002
14.

An analytical model accounting for tip shape evolution during atom probe analysis of heterogeneous materials.

Rolland N, Larson DJ, Geiser BP, Duguay S, Vurpillot F, Blavette D.

Ultramicroscopy. 2015 Dec;159 Pt 2:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

PMID:
25818366
15.

Measurements of field enhancement introduced by a local electrode.

Huang M, Cerezo A, Clifton PH, Smith GD.

Ultramicroscopy. 2001 Oct;89(1-3):163-7.

PMID:
11770742
16.

Spatial resolution in atom probe tomography.

Gault B, Moody MP, De Geuser F, La Fontaine A, Stephenson LT, Haley D, Ringer SP.

Microsc Microanal. 2010 Feb;16(1):99-110. doi: 10.1017/S1431927609991267.

PMID:
20082732
17.

Correlating Atom Probe Crystallographic Measurements with Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction Data.

Breen AJ, Babinsky K, Day AC, Eder K, Oakman CJ, Trimby PW, Primig S, Cairney JM, Ringer SP.

Microsc Microanal. 2017 Apr;23(2):279-290. doi: 10.1017/S1431927616012605. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

PMID:
28288697
18.

Reflections on the Projection of Ions in Atom Probe Tomography.

De Geuser F, Gault B.

Microsc Microanal. 2017 Apr;23(2):238-246. doi: 10.1017/S1431927616012721. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

PMID:
28148309
19.

The influence of experimental parameters and specimen geometry on the mass spectra of copper during pulsed-laser atom-probe tomography.

Kolli RP, Meisenkothen F.

Microsc Microanal. 2014 Dec;20(6):1715-26. doi: 10.1017/S1431927614013488. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

PMID:
25390364
20.

Focused ion beam preparation of atom probe specimens containing a single crystallographically well-defined grain boundary.

Pérez-Willard F, Wolde-Giorgis D, Al-Kassab T, López GA, Mittemeijer EJ, Kirchheim R, Gerthsen D.

Micron. 2008;39(1):45-52. Epub 2007 Jan 20.

PMID:
17331735

Supplemental Content

Support Center