Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 92

1.

The perils of ignoring design effects in experimental studies: lessons from a mammography screening trial.

Glenn BA, Bastani R, Maxwell AE.

Psychol Health. 2013;28(5):593-602. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.756880. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

2.

Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.

Colditz GA.

Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1:10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.

3.

Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial.

del Junco DJ, Vernon SW, Coan SP, Tiro JA, Bastian LA, Savas LS, Perz CA, Lairson DR, Chan W, Warrick C, McQueen A, Rakowski W.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 5;100(5):333-46. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn027. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

4.
5.

Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.

Richardson JL, Mondrus GT, Danley K, Deapen D, Mack T.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Jan;5(1):71-6.

6.

Impact of mammography screening interval on breast cancer diagnosis by menopausal status and BMI.

Dittus K, Geller B, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard R, Braithwaite D, O'Meara ES, Miglioretti DL; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1454-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

7.

Willingness to participate in mammography screening: a randomized controlled questionnaire study of responses to two patient information leaflets with different factual content.

Gummersbach E, in der Schmitten J, Mortsiefer A, Abholz HH, Wegscheider K, Pentzek M.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jan 30;112(5):61-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0061.

8.

Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Reder M, Kolip P.

BMC Womens Health. 2015 Jul 22;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0210-5.

9.

A randomized controlled trial to verify the efficacy of the use of ultrasonography in breast cancer screening aged 40-49 (J-START): 76 196 women registered.

Ishida T, Suzuki A, Kawai M, Narikawa Y, Saito H, Yamamoto S, Tohno E, Sobue T, Fukuda M, Ohuchi N.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;44(2):134-40. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt199. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

PMID:
24407835
10.
11.

A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.

MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, Black AM.

Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(34):1-154. Review.

12.

[Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].

Paci E, Mantellini P, Giorgi Rossi P, Falini P, Puliti D; TBST Working Group.

Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27. Italian.

13.

Possible logistic and sociodemographyc factors on breast cancer screening in Turkey: lessons from a women’s health project in Mersin province.

Abali H, Ata A, Gokçe G, Gokçe H.

J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(2):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0270-7.

PMID:
21976034
14.

An overview of the Swedish randomised mammography trials: total mortality pattern and the representivity of the study cohorts.

Nystrom L, Larsson LG, Wall S, Rutqvist LE, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, Tabar L.

J Med Screen. 1996;3(2):85-7.

PMID:
8849766
15.

Get screened: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to increase mammography and colorectal cancer screening in a large, safety net practice.

Fiscella K, Yosha A, Hendren SK, Humiston S, Winters P, Ford P, Loader S, Specht R, Pope S, Adris A, Marcus S.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 23;10:280. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-280.

16.

The effect of a couples intervention to increase breast cancer screening among korean americans.

Lee E, Menon U, Nandy K, Szalacha L, Kviz F, Cho Y, Miller A, Park H.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 May;41(3):E185-93. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.E185-E193.

17.

Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans.

Vernon SW, del Junco DJ, Tiro JA, Coan SP, Perz CA, Bastian LA, Rakowski W, Chan W, Lairson DR, McQueen A, Fernandez ME, Warrick C, Halder A, DiClemente C.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 5;100(5):347-58. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn026. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

18.

Results of a randomized trial to increase mammogram usage among Samoan women.

Mishra SI, Bastani R, Crespi CM, Chang LC, Luce PH, Baquet CR.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Dec;16(12):2594-604.

19.

Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review.

Autier P, Boniol M, Smans M, Sullivan R, Boyle P.

J R Soc Med. 2015 Nov;108(11):440-50. doi: 10.1177/0141076815593403. Epub 2015 Jul 7. Review.

20.

Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.

Duffy SW, Mackay J, Thomas S, Anderson E, Chen TH, Ellis I, Evans G, Fielder H, Fox R, Gui G, Macmillan D, Moss S, Rogers C, Sibbering M, Wallis M, Warren R, Watson E, Whynes D, Allgood P, Caunt J.

Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(11):vii-xiv, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta17110.

Supplemental Content

Support Center