Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 120

1.

Refractory effects of the N1 event-related potential in experienced cochlear implant patients.

Cowper-Smith CD, Green J, Maessen H, Bance M, Newman AJ.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Feb;52(2):104-12. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.743044. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

PMID:
23282338
2.

Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.

Zirn S, Hempel JM, Schuster M, Hemmert W.

Hear Res. 2013 Feb;296:60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.023. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

PMID:
23220120
3.

The adaptive pattern of the late auditory evoked potential elicited by repeated stimuli in cochlear implant users.

Zhang F, Anderson J, Samy R, Houston L.

Int J Audiol. 2010 Apr;49(4):277-85. doi: 10.3109/14992020903321759.

PMID:
20151878
4.

Recovery function of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Zhang F, Samy RN, Anderson JM, Houston L.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;20(7):397-408.

PMID:
19928394
5.

Auditory processing following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: a pediatric case study using event-related potentials.

Key AP, Porter HL, Bradham T.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):225-38. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.4.2.

PMID:
20388449
6.

Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.

Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jäncke L, Dillier N, Hugdahl K, Meyer M.

Brain. 2009 Jul;132(Pt 7):1967-79. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp034. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

PMID:
19293240
7.

Evidence of a tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex in cochlear implant users.

Guiraud J, Besle J, Arnold L, Boyle P, Giard MH, Bertrand O, Norena A, Truy E, Collet L.

J Neurosci. 2007 Jul 18;27(29):7838-46.

8.

Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Brown CJ, Jeon EK, Chiou LK, Kirby B, Karsten SA, Turner CW, Abbas PJ.

Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):723-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000206.

9.

Temporal interaction in electrical hearing elucidates auditory nerve dynamics in humans.

Karg SA, Lackner C, Hemmert W.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23396273
10.

Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users.

Vaerenberg B, Govaerts PJ, de Ceulaer G, Daemers K, Schauwers K.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Jan;50(1):50-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.531294. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

PMID:
21091083
11.

Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Visram AS, Innes-Brown H, El-Deredy W, McKay CM.

Hear Res. 2015 Sep;327:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 May 7.

PMID:
25959269
12.

Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing.

Laback B, Zimmermann I, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD, Pok SM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1515-29. doi: 10.1121/1.3613704.

PMID:
21895091
13.

The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss.

Chang HW, Dillon H, Carter L, van Dun B, Young ST.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Sep;51(9):663-70. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.690076. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

PMID:
22873205
14.

Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.

Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Wong DD, Papsin BC.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;119(10):2347-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Aug 26.

PMID:
18752993
15.

Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.

Zakis JA, Fulton B, Steele BR.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Dec;51(12):906-13. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.701020. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

PMID:
23025794
16.

Enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users.

Schierholz I, Finke M, Schulte S, Hauthal N, Kantzke C, Rach S, Büchner A, Dengler R, Sandmann P.

Hear Res. 2015 Oct;328:133-47. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

PMID:
26302946
17.
18.

Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.

Nelson DA, Kreft HA, Anderson ES, Donaldson GS.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3916-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3583503.

19.

Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Won JH, Jones GL, Drennan WR, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JT.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2088-97. doi: 10.1121/1.3624820.

20.

Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants.

Wang W, Zhou N, Xu L.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Apr;50(4):270-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.542490. Epub 2010 Dec 29.

PMID:
21190394

Supplemental Content

Support Center