Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiome in the forestomach fluid from the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius).

Bhatt VD, Dande SS, Patil NV, Joshi CG.

Mol Biol Rep. 2013 Apr;40(4):3363-71. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2411-4. Epub 2013 Jan 1.

PMID:
23277394
2.

In-depth diversity analysis of the bacterial community resident in the camel rumen.

Gharechahi J, Zahiri HS, Noghabi KA, Salekdeh GH.

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015 Feb;38(1):67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

PMID:
25467553
3.

Molecular diversity of the foregut bacteria community in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius).

Samsudin AA, Evans PN, Wright AD, Al Jassim R.

Environ Microbiol. 2011 Nov;13(11):3024-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02579.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

PMID:
21914099
4.

Rumen bacterial diversity of 80 to 110-day-old goats using 16S rRNA sequencing.

Han X, Yang Y, Yan H, Wang X, Qu L, Chen Y.

PLoS One. 2015 Feb 20;10(2):e0117811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117811. eCollection 2015.

5.

Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation.

Xu B, Xu W, Li J, Dai L, Xiong C, Tang X, Yang Y, Mu Y, Zhou J, Ding J, Wu Q, Huang Z.

BMC Genomics. 2015 Mar 12;16:174. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1378-7.

6.

Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut.

Lamendella R, Domingo JW, Ghosh S, Martinson J, Oerther DB.

BMC Microbiol. 2011 May 15;11:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-103.

7.

Metagenomic analysis of Surti buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) rumen: a preliminary study.

Singh KM, Ahir VB, Tripathi AK, Ramani UV, Sajnani M, Koringa PG, Jakhesara S, Pandya PR, Rank DN, Murty DS, Kothari RK, Joshi CG.

Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Apr;39(4):4841-8. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-1278-0. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

PMID:
21947953
8.

First insights into the microbial diversity in the omasum and reticulum of bovine using Illumina sequencing.

Peng S, Yin J, Liu X, Jia B, Chang Z, Lu H, Jiang N, Chen Q.

J Appl Genet. 2015 Aug;56(3):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s13353-014-0258-1. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

9.

Characterization of the rumen microbiota of pre-ruminant calves using metagenomic tools.

Li RW, Connor EE, Li C, Baldwin Vi RL, Sparks ME.

Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jan;14(1):129-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02543.x. Epub 2011 Sep 12.

PMID:
21906219
10.

High throughput whole rumen metagenome profiling using untargeted massively parallel sequencing.

Ross EM, Moate PJ, Bath CR, Davidson SE, Sawbridge TI, Guthridge KM, Cocks BG, Hayes BJ.

BMC Genet. 2012 Jul 2;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-53.

11.

Metagenomic assessment of the functional potential of the rumen microbiome in Holstein dairy cows.

Pitta DW, Indugu N, Kumar S, Vecchiarelli B, Sinha R, Baker LD, Bhukya B, Ferguson JD.

Anaerobe. 2016 Apr;38:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

PMID:
26700882
12.

Phage-bacteria relationships and CRISPR elements revealed by a metagenomic survey of the rumen microbiome.

Berg Miller ME, Yeoman CJ, Chia N, Tringe SG, Angly FE, Edwards RA, Flint HJ, Lamed R, Bayer EA, White BA.

Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jan;14(1):207-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02593.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

PMID:
22004549
13.

Metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiota of the Timber Rattlesnake, Crotalus horridus.

McLaughlin RW, Cochran PA, Dowd SE.

Mol Biol Rep. 2015 Jul;42(7):1187-95. doi: 10.1007/s11033-015-3854-1. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

PMID:
25663091
14.

Cellulolytic bacteria in the foregut of the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius).

Samsudin AA, Wright AD, Al Jassim R.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Dec;78(24):8836-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02420-12. Epub 2012 Oct 5.

15.

Taxonomic and functional metagenomic profiling of gastrointestinal tract microbiome of the farmed adult turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).

Xing M, Hou Z, Yuan J, Liu Y, Qu Y, Liu B.

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 Dec;86(3):432-43. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12174. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

16.

Assembly of 913 microbial genomes from metagenomic sequencing of the cow rumen.

Stewart RD, Auffret MD, Warr A, Wiser AH, Press MO, Langford KW, Liachko I, Snelling TJ, Dewhurst RJ, Walker AW, Roehe R, Watson M.

Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 28;9(1):870. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03317-6.

17.

Exploring the sheep rumen microbiome for carbohydrate-active enzymes.

Lopes LD, de Souza Lima AO, Taketani RG, Darias P, da Silva LR, Romagnoli EM, Louvandini H, Abdalla AL, Mendes R.

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Jul;108(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0459-6. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

PMID:
25900454
18.

Microbial and Carbohydrate Active Enzyme profile of buffalo rumen metagenome and their alteration in response to variation in the diet.

Patel DD, Patel AK, Parmar NR, Shah TM, Patel JB, Pandya PR, Joshi CG.

Gene. 2014 Jul 15;545(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 2.

PMID:
24797613
19.

Metagenome of Mehsani buffalo rumen microbiota: an assessment of variation in feed-dependent phylogenetic and functional classification.

Parmar NR, Solanki JV, Patel AB, Shah TM, Patel AK, Parnerkar S, Kumar JI, Joshi CG.

J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;24(4):249-61. doi: 10.1159/000365054. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

PMID:
25228469
20.

The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle.

Wallace RJ, Rooke JA, McKain N, Duthie CA, Hyslop JJ, Ross DW, Waterhouse A, Watson M, Roehe R.

BMC Genomics. 2015 Oct 23;16:839. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2032-0.

Supplemental Content

Support Center