Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 83

1.

Impact of butylscopolamine on image quality of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Venkatanarasimha N, Jenkins SJ, Yang N, Colak E, Kirpalani A.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Apr;82(4):583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.023. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

PMID:
23265180
2.

Usefulness of the navigator-echo triggering technique for free-breathing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Matsunaga K, Ogasawara G, Tsukano M, Iwadate Y, Inoue Y.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Apr;31(3):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

PMID:
23102944
3.

How reliable is MRCP with an SS-FSE sequence at 3.0 T: comparison between SS-FSE BH and 3D-FSE BH ASSET sequences.

Lavdas E, Vlychou M, Arikidis N, Kapsalaki E, Roka V, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis I, Vassiou K.

Clin Imaging. 2013 Jul-Aug;37(4):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

PMID:
23522790
4.

Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques.

Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, Zou KH, Thibodeau S, Tempany CM.

Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):549-59.

PMID:
16436816
5.

Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Yoon LS, Catalano OA, Fritz S, Ferrone CR, Hahn PF, Sahani DV.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):363-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181852193.

PMID:
19478628
6.

High-resolution T2-weighted abdominal magnetic resonance imaging using respiratory triggering: impact of butylscopolamine on image quality.

Wagner M, Klessen C, Rief M, Elgeti T, Taupitz M, Hamm B, Asbach P.

Acta Radiol. 2008 May;49(4):376-82. doi: 10.1080/02841850801894806.

PMID:
18415778
7.

Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography.

Itatani R, Namimoto T, Kajihara H, Yoshimura A, Katahira K, Nasu J, Matsushita I, Sakamoto F, Kidoh M, Yamashita Y.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Jul;23(7):1911-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2790-5. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
23443353
8.

Clinical usefulness of free-breathing navigator-triggered 3D MRCP in non-cooperative patients: comparison with conventional breath-hold 2D MRCP.

Kim JH, Hong SS, Eun HW, Han JK, Choi BI.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Apr;81(4):e513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

PMID:
21700409
9.

Effect of butylscopolamine on image quality in MRI of the prostate.

Wagner M, Rief M, Busch J, Scheurig C, Taupitz M, Hamm B, Franiel T.

Clin Radiol. 2010 Jun;65(6):460-4. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.02.007.

PMID:
20451013
10.

Frequency of common bile duct motion artifacts caused by inferior vena cava pulsation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Morita S, Ueno E, Saito N, Suzuki K, Machida H, Fujimura M, Maruyama K, Onodera Y, Watanabe K, Suzuki T, Ohnishi T, Imura C, Mitsuhashi N.

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(1):31-6.

11.

Image quality and bile duct volumetry in MR cholangiopancreatography augmented with low-dose morphine.

Kröpil P, Erhardt A, Mehnert S, Beck A, Häussinger D, Mödder U, Blondin D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):W171-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3010.

PMID:
20093569
12.

MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.

Onishi H, Kim T, Hori M, Murakami T, Tatsumi M, Nakaya Y, Nakamoto A, Osuga K, Tomoda K, Nakamura H.

Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):559-65. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c0ae.

PMID:
19692840
13.

The effects of N-butylscopolamine on bowel uptake: an 18F-FDG PET study.

Emmott J, Sanghera B, Chambers J, Wong WL.

Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Jan;29(1):11-6.

PMID:
18049092
14.

2D thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography: does parallel imaging with sensitivity encoding improve image quality and duct visualization?

Hosseinzadeh K, Furlan A, Almusa O.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jun;190(6):W327-34. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2854.

PMID:
18492874
15.

Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study.

Zhang J, Israel GM, Hecht EM, Krinsky GA, Babb JS, Lee VS.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):1564-70.

PMID:
17114551
16.

Navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique vs. conventional respiratory-triggered technique for free-breathing 3D MRCP: an initial prospective comparative study using healthy volunteers.

Morita S, Ueno E, Suzuki K, Machida H, Fujimura M, Kojima S, Hirata M, Ohnishi T, Imura C.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):673-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21485.

PMID:
18777550
17.

Clinical Feasibility of 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Using Compressed Sensing: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance.

Yoon JH, Lee SM, Kang HJ, Weiland E, Raithel E, Son Y, Kiefer B, Lee JM.

Invest Radiol. 2017 Oct;52(10):612-619. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000380.

PMID:
28448309
18.

Morphine- and glucagon-augmented magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to evaluate living liver donors.

Mo YH, Liang PC, Ho MC, Lee PH, Jaw FS, Peng SS.

Liver Transpl. 2009 Sep;15(9):1021-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.21789.

19.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction.

Asbach P, Klessen C, Kroencke TJ, Kluner C, Stemmer A, Hamm B, Taupitz M.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Nov;23(9):939-45. Epub 2005 Oct 20.

PMID:
16310109
20.

Focal pancreatitis mimicking pancreatic mass: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings including diffusion-weighted MRI.

Momtahen AJ, Balci NC, Alkaade S, Akduman EI, Burton FR.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Jun;49(5):490-7. doi: 10.1080/02841850802014602.

PMID:
18568532

Supplemental Content

Support Center