Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 181

1.

Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.

Wang HS, Pisegna J, Modi R, Liang LJ, Atia M, Nguyen M, Cohen H, Ohning G, van Oijen M, Spiegel BM.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jan;77(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.038.

PMID:
23261096
2.

Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).

Lee RH, Tang RS, Muthusamy VR, Ho SB, Shah NK, Wetzel L, Bain AS, Mackintosh EE, Paek AM, Crissien AM, Saraf LJ, Kalmaz DM, Savides TJ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 30.

PMID:
21531410
3.

The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.

Madhoun MF, Tierney WM.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

PMID:
21963062
4.

Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.

Kahi CJ, Ballard D, Shah AS, Mears R, Johnson CS.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

PMID:
23472996
5.

Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.

Patel NC, Islam RS, Wu Q, Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Crowell MD, Faigel DO.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.032. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

PMID:
23199647
6.

Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.

Gawron AJ, Thompson WK, Keswani RN, Rasmussen LV, Kho AN.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;109(12):1844-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.147. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

PMID:
24935271
7.

Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.

Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A, Jacobson BC.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):376-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.023. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

PMID:
23211748
8.

The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.

Aniwan S, Orkoonsawat P, Viriyautsahakul V, Angsuwatcharakon P, Pittayanon R, Wisedopas N, Sumdin S, Ponuthai Y, Wiangngoen S, Kullavanijaya P, Rerknimitr R.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;111(5):723-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.440. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

PMID:
26809333
9.

A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.

Yen AW, Leung JW, Leung FW.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

PMID:
23473001
10.

Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position.

Lurix E, Hernandez AV, Thoma M, Castro F.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

PMID:
22321696
11.

An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.

Coe SG, Crook JE, Diehl NN, Wallace MB.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;108(2):219-26; quiz 227. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.417. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

PMID:
23295274
12.

Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy.

Chen SC, Rex DK.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;102(4):856-61. Epub 2007 Jan 11.

PMID:
17222317
13.

Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men.

Coe SG, Wallace MB.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr;77(4):631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

PMID:
23375528
14.

Do we need colonoscopy in patients with gastric adenomas? The risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with gastric adenomas.

Yang MH, Son HJ, Lee JH, Kim MH, Kim JY, Kim YH, Chang DK, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.042.

PMID:
20363417
15.

Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.

Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.055. Epub 2010 May 20.

PMID:
20493487
16.

Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.

Lee TJ, Blanks RG, Rees CJ, Wright KC, Nickerson C, Moss SM, Chilton A, Goddard AF, Patnick J, McNally RJ, Rutter MD.

Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):20-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325803. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

PMID:
23254403
17.

High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.

Kahi CJ, Anderson JC, Waxman I, Kessler WR, Imperiale TF, Li X, Rex DK.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1301-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.51. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

PMID:
20179689
18.

Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing.

Bretagne JF, Hamonic S, Piette C, Manfredi S, Leray E, Durand G, Riou F.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.032. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

PMID:
19922930
19.

Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study.

Denis B, Sauleau EA, Gendre I, Piette C, Bretagne JF, Perrin P.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1325-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.038. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

PMID:
21958899
20.

Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience.

Kahi CJ, Vemulapalli KC, Johnson CS, Rex DK.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

PMID:
24246797

Supplemental Content

Support Center