Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 159

1.

A comprehensive environmental assessment approach to engineered nanomaterials.

Davis JM.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2013 Mar-Apr;5(2):139-49. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1203. Epub 2012 Dec 17. Review.

PMID:
23255303
2.

Comprehensive environmental assessment: a meta-assessment approach.

Powers CM, Dana G, Gillespie P, Gwinn MR, Hendren CO, Long TC, Wang A, Davis JM.

Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 4;46(17):9202-8. doi: 10.1021/es3023072. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

3.

Transparent stakeholder engagement in practice: Lessons learned from applying comprehensive environmental assessment to research planning for nanomaterials.

Powers C, Hendren C, Wang A, Davis JM.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2014 Oct;10(4):498-510. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1537. Epub 2014 May 29.

PMID:
24729532
4.

Sensors as tools for quantitation, nanotoxicity and nanomonitoring assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Sadik OA, Zhou AL, Kikandi S, Du N, Wang Q, Varner K.

J Environ Monit. 2009 Oct;11(10):1782-800. doi: 10.1039/b912860c. Epub 2009 Sep 14. Review.

PMID:
19809701
5.

A web-based tool to engage stakeholders in informing research planning for future decisions on emerging materials.

Powers CM, Grieger KD, Hendren CO, Meacham CA, Gurevich G, Lassiter MG, Money ES, Lloyd JM, Beaulieu SM.

Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 1;470-471:660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

6.

Environmental exposure assessment of engineered nanoparticles: why REACH needs adjustment.

Meesters JA, Veltman K, Hendriks AJ, van de Meent D.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Jul;9(3):e15-26. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1446. Epub 2013 Jun 25. Review.

PMID:
23633247
7.

The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment.

Gottschalk F, Nowack B.

J Environ Monit. 2011 May;13(5):1145-55. doi: 10.1039/c0em00547a. Epub 2011 Mar 9. Review.

PMID:
21387066
8.

Current limitations and challenges in nanowaste detection, characterisation and monitoring.

Part F, Zecha G, Causon T, Sinner EK, Huber-Humer M.

Waste Manag. 2015 Sep;43:407-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 Jun 24. Review.

PMID:
26117420
9.

In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.

Cohen Y, Rallo R, Liu R, Liu HH.

Acc Chem Res. 2013 Mar 19;46(3):802-12. doi: 10.1021/ar300049e. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

PMID:
23138971
10.

Analysis of engineered nanomaterials in complex matrices (environment and biota): general considerations and conceptual case studies.

von der Kammer F, Ferguson PL, Holden PA, Masion A, Rogers KR, Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N, Unrine JM.

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012 Jan;31(1):32-49. doi: 10.1002/etc.723. Epub 2011 Nov 23. Review.

PMID:
22021021
11.

Simulated environmental risk estimation of engineered nanomaterials: a case of cosmetics in Johannesburg City.

Musee N.

Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011 Sep;30(9):1181-95. doi: 10.1177/0960327110391387. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

PMID:
21148195
12.

Conceptual modeling for identification of worst case conditions in environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials using nZVI and C60 as case studies.

Grieger KD, Hansen SF, Sørensen PB, Baun A.

Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):4109-24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.021. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

PMID:
21737121
13.

Searching for global descriptors of engineered nanomaterial fate and transport in the environment.

Westerhoff P, Nowack B.

Acc Chem Res. 2013 Mar 19;46(3):844-53. doi: 10.1021/ar300030n. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

14.

Fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment.

Lin D, Tian X, Wu F, Xing B.

J Environ Qual. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6):1896-908. Review.

PMID:
21284287
15.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.

PMID:
14698953
16.

Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials.

Liu HH, Cohen Y.

Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Mar 18;48(6):3281-92. doi: 10.1021/es405132z. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

PMID:
24548277
17.

Guidance for the prognostic risk assessment of nanomaterials in aquatic ecosystems.

Koelmans AA, Diepens NJ, Velzeboer I, Besseling E, Quik JT, van de Meent D.

Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;535:141-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.032. Epub 2015 Feb 14.

PMID:
25684040
18.

Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies.

Gottschalk F, Sun T, Nowack B.

Environ Pollut. 2013 Oct;181:287-300. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 12. Review.

PMID:
23856352
19.

What do the data show? Knowledge map development for comprehensive environmental assessment.

Painter K, McConnell ER, Sahasrabudhe S, Burgoon L, Powers CM.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2014 Jan;10(1):37-47. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1486. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

PMID:
24327299
20.

Systematic approach to evaluating trade-offs among fuel options: the lessons of MTBE.

Davis JM, Thomas VM.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Sep;1076:498-515.

PMID:
17119228

Supplemental Content

Support Center