Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 137

1.

Comparison among load-, ROM-, and displacement-controlled methods used in the lumbosacral nonlinear finite-element analysis.

Chuang WH, Kuo YJ, Lin SC, Wang CW, Chen SH, Chen YJ, Hwang JR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 1;38(5):E276-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828251f9.

PMID:
23250233
2.

Kinematic and mechanical comparisons of lumbar hybrid fixation using Dynesys and Cosmic systems.

Chien CY, Kuo YJ, Lin SC, Chuang WH, Luh YP.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 1;39(15):E878-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000388.

PMID:
24827511
3.

Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.

Chuang WH, Lin SC, Chen SH, Wang CW, Tsai WC, Chen YJ, Hwang JR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 15;37(24):E1488-97. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826cdd93.

PMID:
22872225
4.

Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.

Bartanusz V, Muzumdar A, Hussain M, Moldavsky M, Bucklen B, Khalil S.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):1017-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92458.

PMID:
21224772
5.

Load- and displacement-controlled finite element analyses on fusion and non-fusion spinal implants.

Zhong ZC, Chen SH, Hung CH.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009 Feb;223(2):143-57.

PMID:
19278192
6.

Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.

Wang T, Liu H, Zheng Z, Li Z, Wang J, Shrivastava SS, Yang H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E925-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182967968.

PMID:
23609200
7.

Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Chen SH, Chiang MC, Lin JF, Lin SC, Hung CH.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Oct 2;14:281. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-281.

8.

Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.

Demetropoulos CK, Sengupta DK, Knaub MA, Wiater BP, Abjornson C, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 1;35(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c4eb9a.

PMID:
20042953
9.

Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.

Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Hu N, Kim SW, Bridwell KH, McAfee PC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 15;35(6):E198-205. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c142bf.

PMID:
20195199
10.

Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Zhu Q, Itshayek E, Jones CF, Schwab T, Larson CR, Lenke LG, Cripton PA.

Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5:S599-611. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2301-4.

11.

Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.

Guan Y, Yoganandan N, Maiman DJ, Pintar FA.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):299-304. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812e6276.

PMID:
18525492
12.

Pretension effects of the Dynesys cord on the tissue responses and screw-spacer behaviors of the lumbosacral construct with hybrid fixation.

Chien CY, Tan CH, Lu TH, Lin SC, Chuang WH, Chiang MC, Luh YP, Chen YJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E775-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318290fb2e.

PMID:
23486410
13.

Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.

Chung SK, Kim YE, Wang KC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20;34(12):1281-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4ec2d.

PMID:
19455003
14.

Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum.

Untch C, Liu Q, Hart R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2376-81.

PMID:
15507798
15.

A computational biomechanical investigation of posterior dynamic instrumentation: combination of dynamic rod and hinged (dynamic) screw.

Erbulut DU, Kiapour A, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF, Goel VK.

J Biomech Eng. 2014 May;136(5):051007. doi: 10.1115/1.4027060.

PMID:
24599026
16.

[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].

Zencica P, Chaloupka R, Hladíková J, Krbec M.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30. Czech.

PMID:
20447355
17.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, Pellegrino A, Vaccaro AR, Siegler S, Albert TJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):E65-70.

PMID:
15094547
18.

Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.

Akesen B, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577242.

PMID:
18418135
19.

Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc.

Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 15;26(6):E122-9.

PMID:
11246394
20.

Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.

Liu CL, Zhong ZC, Shih SL, Hung C, Lee YE, Chen CS.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):410-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b63d89.

PMID:
20683426

Supplemental Content

Support Center