Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 148

1.

Behavior of visual field index in advanced glaucoma.

Rao HL, Senthil S, Choudhari NS, Mandal AK, Garudadri CS.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 14;54(1):307-12. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10836.

PMID:
23233259
2.

Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss.

Lee JM, Cirineo N, Ramanathan M, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Morales E, Coleman AL, Caprioli J.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;157(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

PMID:
24200229
3.

Properties of the statpac visual field index.

Artes PH, O'Leary N, Hutchison DM, Heckler L, Sharpe GP, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 8;52(7):4030-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6905.

PMID:
21467169
4.

Effect of cataract extraction on Visual Field Index in glaucoma.

Rao HL, Jonnadula GB, Addepalli UK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS.

J Glaucoma. 2013 Feb;22(2):164-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31822e8e37.

PMID:
21946552
5.

Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage.

Prata TS, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Tello C, Ritch R, Liebmann JM.

Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan;117(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.028. Epub 2009 Nov 6.

PMID:
19896197
6.

Central Field Index Versus Visual Field Index for Central Visual Function in Stable Glaucoma.

Rao A, Padhy D, Mudunuri H, Roy AK, Sarangi SP, Das G.

J Glaucoma. 2017 Jan;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000541.

PMID:
27636596
7.

Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations.

Rao HL, Begum VU, Khadka D, Mandal AK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS.

PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0127233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127233. eCollection 2015.

8.

The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability.

Arora KS, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Jefferys JL, West SK, Ramulu PY.

Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2476-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

9.

Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS.

Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.027. Epub 2010 Aug 21.

PMID:
20728941
10.

Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.

Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 1;52(9):7007-11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7643.

PMID:
21810985
11.

Progression detection in different stages of glaucoma: mean deviation versus visual field index.

Cho JW, Sung KR, Yun SC, Na JH, Lee Y, Kook MS.

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;56(2):128-33. doi: 10.1007/s10384-011-0110-7. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

PMID:
22203464
12.

Short duration transient visual evoked potentials in glaucomatous eyes.

Prata TS, Lima VC, De Moraes CG, Trubnik V, Derr P, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Tello C.

J Glaucoma. 2012 Aug;21(6):415-20. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182182551.

PMID:
21562431
13.

Effect of Cataract Opacity Type and Glaucoma Severity on Visual Field Index.

Chung HJ, Choi JH, Lee YC, Kim SY.

Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jun;93(6):575-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000842.

PMID:
27214250
14.

Baseline mean deviation and rates of visual field change in treated glaucoma patients.

Forchheimer I, de Moraes CG, Teng CC, Folgar F, Tello C, Ritch R, Liebmann JM.

Eye (Lond). 2011 May;25(5):626-32. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.33. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

15.

[Analysis of a new visual field index, the VFI, in Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma].

Giraud JM, Fenolland JR, May F, Hammam O, Sadat AM, Boumezrag AB, Renard JP.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2010 Jan;33(1):2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Dec 10. French.

16.

Hierarchical cluster analysis of progression patterns in open-angle glaucoma patients with medical treatment.

Bae HW, Rho S, Lee HS, Lee N, Hong S, Seong GJ, Sung KR, Kim CY.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Apr 29;55(5):3231-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13856.

PMID:
24781944
17.

Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.

Manassakorn A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Koucheki B, Law SK, Caprioli J.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2896-903.

PMID:
16799031
18.

The Fast Component of Visual Field Decay Rate Correlates With Disc Rim Area Change Throughout the Entire Range of Glaucomatous Damage.

Lee JW, Kim EA, Otarola F, Morales E, Yu F, Afifi AA, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Sep;56(10):5997-6006. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17006.

PMID:
26393466
19.

Validation of point-wise exponential regression to measure the decay rates of glaucomatous visual fields.

Azarbod P, Mock D, Bitrian E, Afifi AA, Yu F, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Coleman AL, Caprioli J.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 9;53(9):5403-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9930.

PMID:
22743320
20.

[Relationship between visual field index and visual field morphological stages of glaucoma and their diagnostic value].

Hou XR, Qin JY, Ren ZQ.

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 11;53(2):92-97. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.02.005. Chinese.

PMID:
28260358

Supplemental Content

Support Center