Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

Evaluation of the 7th American Joint Committee on cancer TNM staging system for prostate cancer in point of classification of bladder neck invasion.

Chung MS, Lee SH, Lee DH, Chung BH.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;43(2):184-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys196. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

PMID:
23225909
2.
3.

The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted.

Pierorazio PM, Epstein JI, Humphreys E, Han M, Walsh PC, Partin AW.

J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.138.

PMID:
19914651
4.

Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.

Buschemeyer WC 3rd, Hamilton RJ, Aronson WJ, Presti JC Jr, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Freedland SJ.

J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):124-9; discussion 129. Epub 2007 Nov 12.

PMID:
17997433
5.

Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor.

Yossepowitch O, Sircar K, Scardino PT, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Reuter VE.

J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):2011-5.

PMID:
12394697
7.

Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

8.

Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.

Aydin H, Tsuzuki T, Hernandez D, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI.

Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):551-5.

PMID:
15351591
9.

The significance of microscopic bladder neck invasion in radical prostatectomies: pT4 disease?

Ruano T, Meirelles L, Freitas LL, Magna LA, Ferreira U, Billis A.

Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-008-9400-5. Epub 2008 Jun 19.

PMID:
18563619
10.

Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy.

DeLancey JO, Wood DP Jr, He C, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Miller DC, Jacobs BL, Montie JE, Hollenbeck BK, Skolarus TA.

Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):354-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.034.

PMID:
23374801
11.

Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.

Freedland SJ, Aronson W, Presti JC Jr, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Elashoff D, Amling CL; SEARCH Database Study Group..

J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2142-6.

PMID:
12771736
12.

Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor.

Zhou M, Reuther AM, Levin HS, Falzarano SM, Kodjoe E, Myles J, Klein E, Magi-Galluzzi C.

Mod Pathol. 2009 Mar;22(3):385-92. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.190. Epub 2008 Nov 28.

13.

Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Cheng L, Jones TD, Lin H, Eble JN, Zeng G, Carr MD, Koch MO.

J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2181-5.

PMID:
16280760
14.

Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence.

Poulos CK, Koch MO, Eble JN, Daggy JK, Cheng L.

Cancer. 2004 Oct 1;101(7):1563-8.

16.

Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.

Freedland SJ, Presti JC Jr, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Aronson WJ, Dorey F, Amling CL; SEARCH Database Study Group..

J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2129-35.

PMID:
12771734
17.

The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.

Chuang AY, Nielsen ME, Hernandez DJ, Walsh PC, Epstein JI.

J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. Epub 2007 Aug 14.

PMID:
17698141
18.

Radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer with microscopic bladder neck involvement: survival and prognostic implications.

Villari D, Nesi G, Della Melina A, Palli D, Ceroti M, Castigli M, Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Nicita G.

BJU Int. 2010 Apr;105(7):946-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08914.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.

19.

Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.

Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS.

J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2453-6.

PMID:
11992056
20.

Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy: predicting risk factors for progression.

Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Johnson CW, McKiernan JM, Goluboff ET, Abbou CC, Olsson CA, Benson MC.

Urology. 2003 Aug;62(2):304-9.

PMID:
12893340

Supplemental Content

Support Center