Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 92

1.

Close but not proximate: the significance of phonological segments in speaking depends on their functional engagement.

O'Seaghdha PG, Chen JY, Chen TM.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2;110(1):E3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217032110. Epub 2012 Dec 7. No abstract available.

2.

Reply to O’Seaghdha et al.: Primary phonological planning units in Chinese are phonemically specified.

Qu Q, Damian MF, Kazanina N.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2;110(1):E4. No abstract available.

3.

Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers.

Qu Q, Damian MF, Kazanina N.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 28;109(35):14265-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200632109. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

4.

Speech perception in noise deficits in Japanese children with reading difficulties: effects of presentation rate.

Inoue T, Higashibara F, Okazaki S, Maekawa H.

Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2748-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.035. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

PMID:
21715142
5.

Effects of EPG treatment for English consonant contrasts on L2 perception and production.

Schmidt AM.

Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Dec;26(11-12):909-25. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.718036.

PMID:
23057792
6.
7.

Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.

Warker JA, Dell GS.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):387-98.

PMID:
16569154
8.

Perception of prosodic hierarchical boundaries in Mandarin Chinese sentences.

Li W, Yang Y.

Neuroscience. 2009 Feb 18;158(4):1416-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.065. Epub 2008 Nov 24.

PMID:
19111906
9.

Shared language: overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI.

Menenti L, Gierhan SM, Segaert K, Hagoort P.

Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1173-82. doi: 10.1177/0956797611418347. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

PMID:
21841148
10.
11.

Categorical speech perception deficits distinguish language and reading impairments in children.

Robertson EK, Joanisse MF, Desroches AS, Ng S.

Dev Sci. 2009 Sep;12(5):753-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00806.x.

PMID:
19702768
12.

Perception and awareness in phonological processing: the case of the phoneme.

Morais J, Kolinsky R.

Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):287-97. Review.

PMID:
8039365
13.

Perception of tone and aspiration contrasts in Chinese children with dyslexia.

Cheung H, Chung KK, Wong SW, McBride-Chang C, Penney TB, Ho CS.

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;50(6):726-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02001.x. Epub 2008 Nov 3.

PMID:
19175808
14.

Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming.

Oppermann F, Jescheniak JD, Schriefers H, Gorges F.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Feb;63(2):356-70. doi: 10.1080/17470210902952480. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

PMID:
19557668
15.

The functional unit in phonological encoding: evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers.

Kureta Y, Fushimi T, Tatsumi IF.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Sep;32(5):1102-19.

PMID:
16938049
16.

The relation between phonetics and phonology.

Blumstein SE.

Phonetica. 1991;48(2-4):108-19. Review.

PMID:
1800994
17.

Speech perception deficits by Chinese children with phonological dyslexia.

Liu W, Shu H, Yang Y.

J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jul;103(3):338-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

PMID:
19380151
18.

The labial-coronal effect revisited: Japanese adults say pata, but hear tapa.

Tsuji S, Gomez NG, Medina V, Nazzi T, Mazuka R.

Cognition. 2012 Dec;125(3):413-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

PMID:
22921188
19.

Perception of basic emotions from speech prosody in adolescents with Asperger's syndrome.

Heikkinen J, Jansson-Verkasalo E, Toivanen J, Suominen K, Väyrynen E, Moilanen I, Seppänen T.

Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2010 Oct;35(3):113-20. doi: 10.3109/14015430903311184.

PMID:
19883170
20.

Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children.

Wong P, Schwartz RG, Jenkins JJ.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Oct;48(5):1065-79.

PMID:
16411796

Supplemental Content

Support Center