Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 144

1.

Genetic diversity and the structure of genealogies in rapidly adapting populations.

Desai MM, Walczak AM, Fisher DS.

Genetics. 2013 Feb;193(2):565-85. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.147157. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

2.

The structure of genealogies in the presence of purifying selection: a fitness-class coalescent.

Walczak AM, Nicolaisen LE, Plotkin JB, Desai MM.

Genetics. 2012 Feb;190(2):753-79. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.134544. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

3.

The dynamics of genetic draft in rapidly adapting populations.

Kosheleva K, Desai MM.

Genetics. 2013 Nov;195(3):1007-25. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.156430. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

4.

Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection and recombination.

Nicolaisen LE, Desai MM.

Genetics. 2013 Sep;195(1):221-30. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.152983. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

5.

Evolution of Mutation Rates in Rapidly Adapting Asexual Populations.

Good BH, Desai MM.

Genetics. 2016 Nov;204(3):1249-1266. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.193565. Epub 2016 Sep 19.

6.

Genealogies of rapidly adapting populations.

Neher RA, Hallatschek O.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):437-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213113110. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

7.

Signatures of positive selection: from selective sweeps at individual loci to subtle allele frequency changes in polygenic adaptation.

Stephan W.

Mol Ecol. 2016 Jan;25(1):79-88. doi: 10.1111/mec.13288. Epub 2015 Jul 27. Review.

PMID:
26108992
8.

The adaptation rate of asexuals: deleterious mutations, clonal interference and population bottlenecks.

Campos PR, Wahl LM.

Evolution. 2010 Jul;64(7):1973-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00981.x. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

PMID:
20199567
9.

A Coalescent Model for a Sweep of a Unique Standing Variant.

Berg JJ, Coop G.

Genetics. 2015 Oct;201(2):707-25. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178962. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

10.

Synchronous waves of failed soft sweeps in the laboratory: remarkably rampant clonal interference of alleles at a single locus.

Lee MC, Marx CJ.

Genetics. 2013 Mar;193(3):943-52. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.148502. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

11.

Beneficial mutation selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection.

Desai MM, Fisher DS.

Genetics. 2007 Jul;176(3):1759-98. Epub 2007 May 4.

12.

Coalescent under the evolution of coadaptation.

Ryo Takahasi K.

Mol Ecol. 2009 Dec;18(24):5018-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04424.x. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

PMID:
19912539
13.

Hitchhiking effect of a beneficial mutation spreading in a subdivided population.

Kim Y, Maruki T.

Genetics. 2011 Sep;189(1):213-26. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130203. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

14.

Approximating genealogies for partially linked neutral loci under a selective sweep.

Pfaffelhuber P, Studeny A.

J Math Biol. 2007 Sep;55(3):299-330. Epub 2007 Mar 30.

PMID:
17396267
15.

Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection.

Nicolaisen LE, Desai MM.

Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Nov;29(11):3589-600. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss170. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

PMID:
22729750
16.

Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.

Schrider DR, Mendes FK, Hahn MW, Kern AD.

Genetics. 2015 May;200(1):267-84. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.174912. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

17.

Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution.

McDonald MJ, Rice DP, Desai MM.

Nature. 2016 Mar 10;531(7593):233-6. doi: 10.1038/nature17143. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

18.

Simulation of 'hitch-hiking' genealogies.

Slade PF.

J Math Biol. 2001 Jan;42(1):41-70.

PMID:
11271508
19.

Why sex and recombination?

Barton NH.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2009;74:187-95. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.030. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Review.

PMID:
19903748
20.

A continuous-state coalescent and the impact of weak selection on the structure of gene genealogies.

O'Fallon BD, Seger J, Adler FR.

Mol Biol Evol. 2010 May;27(5):1162-72. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq006. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

Supplemental Content

Support Center