Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105

1.

Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Blankenship JC, Gigliotti OS, Feldman DN, Mixon TA, Patel RA, Sorajja P, Yakubov SJ, Chambers CE; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;81(5):748-58. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24701. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

PMID:
23197438
2.

SCAI expert consensus statement: Evaluation, management, and special considerations of cardio-oncology patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (Endorsed by the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologıa Intervencionista).

Iliescu C, Grines CL, Herrmann J, Yang EH, Cilingiroglu M, Charitakis K, Hakeem A, Toutouzas K, Leesar MA, Marmagkiolis K.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):895-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26375. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

PMID:
26700403
3.

Ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease--a study of prevalence, safety, and variation in use from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR).

Krone RJ, Shaw RE, Klein LW, Blankenship JC, Weintraub WS; American College of Cardiology - National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):696-703.

PMID:
17039514
4.

Staging of multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions: an expert consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Blankenship JC, Moussa ID, Chambers CC, Brilakis ES, Haldis TA, Morrison DA, Dehmer GJ; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jun 1;79(7):1138-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23353. Epub 2011 Nov 9. Review.

PMID:
22072562
5.

SCAI Expert consensus statement: Evaluation, management, and special considerations of cardio-oncology patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (endorsed by the cardiological society of india, and sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologıa intervencionista).

Iliescu CA, Grines CL, Herrmann J, Yang EH, Cilingiroglu M, Charitakis K, Hakeem A, Toutouzas KP, Leesar MA, Marmagkiolis K.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):E202-23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26379. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Review.

PMID:
26756277
6.

SCAI statement on ad hoc versus the separate performance of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.

Blankenship JC, Klein LW, Laskey WK, Krone RJ, Dehmer GJ, Chambers C, Cowley M.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Dec;63(4):444-51. Review.

PMID:
15558758
7.
8.

Feasibility and safety of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern era.

Good CW, Blankenship JC, Scott TD, Skelding KA, Berger PB, Wood GC.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 May;21(5):194-200.

9.

Ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention and staged percutaneous coronary intervention.

Rahman Z, Paul GK, Choudhury AK.

Mymensingh Med J. 2011 Oct;20(4):757-65. Review.

PMID:
22081203
10.

Impact of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in angina patients.

Kim YH, Park DW, Ahn JM, Park GM, Cho YR, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Yun SC, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ; IRIS-DES registry.

EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):110-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A16.

11.

Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on quality of life: a consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Blankenship JC, Marshall JJ, Pinto DS, Lange RA, Bates ER, Holper EM, Grines CL, Chambers CE; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):243-59. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24376. Epub 2012 Apr 27. Review.

12.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions performed immediately after diagnostic catheterization in northern new england and comparison with similar procedures performed later.

Shubrooks SJ Jr, Malenka DJ, Piper WD, Bradley WA, Watkins MW, Ryan TJ, Hettleman BD, VerLee PN, O'Meara JR, Robb JF, Kellett MA, Hearne MA, McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, O'Rourke DJ, Silver TM.

Am J Cardiol. 2000 Jul 1;86(1):41-5.

PMID:
10867090
13.

Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention's transradial working group.

Rao SV, Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, Shah PB, Gulati R, Shroff AR, Crisco V, Woody W, Zoghbi G, Duffy PL, Sanghvi K, Krucoff MW, Pyne CT, Skelding KA, Patel T, Pancholy SB; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention's Transradial Working Group.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;83(2):228-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25209. Epub 2013 Oct 23. No abstract available.

PMID:
24123781
14.

Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.

Cohen DJ, Osnabrugge RL, Magnuson EA, Wang K, Li H, Chinnakondepalli K, Pinto D, Abdallah MS, Vilain KA, Morice MC, Dawkins KD, Kappetein AP, Mohr FW, Serruys PW; SYNTAX Trial Investigators.

Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

15.

Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.

Osnabrugge RL, Magnuson EA, Serruys PW, Campos CM, Wang K, van Klaveren D, Farooq V, Abdallah MS, Li H, Vilain KA, Steyerberg EW, Morice MC, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, Kappetein AP, Cohen DJ; SYNTAX trial investigators.

Heart. 2015 Dec;101(24):1980-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307578. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

PMID:
26552756
16.

Conversations in cardiology--Is BVS ready for prime time? More about the absorb study.

Kern MJ.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):902-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26343. Epub 2015 Dec 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
26649485
17.

API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.

Association of Physicians of India.

J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80. Review.

PMID:
16909697
18.

Procedural variation in the performance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a SCAI-based survey study of US interventional cardiologists.

Chiang A, Gada H, Kodali SK, Lee MS, Jeremias A, Pinto DS, Bangalore S, Yeh RW, Henry TD, Lopez-Cruz G, Mehran R, Kirtane AJ.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr 1;83(5):721-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25276. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

PMID:
24273213
19.

Effect of one-cycle remote ischemic preconditioning to reduce myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Zografos TA, Katritsis GD, Tsiafoutis I, Bourboulis N, Katsivas A, Katritsis DG.

Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 15;113(12):2013-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

PMID:
24793669
20.

Projected costs and consequences of computed tomography-determined fractional flow reserve.

Hlatky MA, Saxena A, Koo BK, Erglis A, Zarins CK, Min JK.

Clin Cardiol. 2013 Dec;36(12):743-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.22205. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

Supplemental Content

Support Center