Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.

Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2013 Jan;51(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.09.006. Review.

PMID:
23182509
2.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.

Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM, Savarino JE, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM, Zauber AG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Aug 18;102(16):1238-52. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq242. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

3.

Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.

Pyenson B, Pickhardt PJ, Sawhney TG, Berrios M.

Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):2966-76. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0538-1.

4.

An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?

Kriza C, Emmert M, Wahlster P, Niederländer C, Kolominsky-Rabas P.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):e629-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 12. Review.

PMID:
23938237
5.

Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.

Lucidarme O, Cadi M, Berger G, Taieb J, Poynard T, Grenier P, Beresniak A.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jul;81(7):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Mar 27.

PMID:
21444171
6.

Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.

Hassan C, Zullo A, Laghi A, Reitano I, Taggi F, Cerro P, Iafrate F, Giustini M, Winn S, Morini S.

Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Mar;39(3):242-50. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

PMID:
17112797
7.

CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Kim DH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1332-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2646.

PMID:
19380558
8.

CT colonography and cost-effectiveness.

Mavranezouli I, East JE, Taylor SA.

Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2485-97. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1058-y. Epub 2008 Jun 27. Review.

PMID:
18584178
9.

Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, Kim DH, Zullo A, Iafrate F, Di Giulio L, Morini S.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Apr 14;168(7):696-705. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.7.696. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1269. Pickhardt, Perry [corrected to Pickhardt, Perry J]; Kim, Daniel [corrected to Kim, Daniel H]. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1710.

PMID:
18413551
10.

Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.

Vanness DJ, Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM, Gareen IF, Herman BA, Kuntz KM, Zauber AG, van Ballegooijen M, Feuer EJ, Chen MH, Johnson CD.

Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):487-98. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102411. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

11.

At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.

Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Habbema JD.

Int J Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;124(5):1161-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24025.

12.

The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J, Wong RK, Choi JR, Napierkowski J, Koff JM, Pickhardt PJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):380-90. Epub 2006 Dec 11.

13.

Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Iafrate F, Morini S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov;191(5):1509-16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1010.

PMID:
18941093
14.

Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.

Regge D, Iussich G, Senore C, Correale L, Hassan C, Bert A, Montemezzi S, Segnan N.

Trials. 2014 Mar 28;15:97. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-97.

15.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S.

Cancer. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):2213-21.

16.

CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Moawad FJ, Maydonovitch CL, Cullen PA, Barlow DS, Jenson DW, Cash BD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):1118-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4921.

PMID:
20966316
17.

A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.

van Gils P, van den Berg M, van Kranen H, de Wit AG.

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jun;45(9):1554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Mar 2. Review.

PMID:
19261464
18.

Speaking for the evidence: colonoscopy vs computed tomographic colonography.

Harris R.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Aug 18;102(16):1212-4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq286. Epub 2010 Jul 22. No abstract available.

PMID:
20651321
19.

Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.

Lee D, Muston D, Sweet A, Cunningham C, Slater A, Lock K.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(3):141-54. doi: 10.2165/11535650-000000000-00000.

PMID:
20369905
20.

[CT colonography in the screening for polyps and cancer].

Drolsum A, Mellingen K.

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Dec 13;127(24):3240; author reply 3240-1. Norwegian. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center