Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 67

1.

Duration judgments over multiple elements.

Ayhan I, Revina Y, Bruno A, Johnston A.

Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 5;3:459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00459. eCollection 2012.

2.

Working Memory for Sequences of Temporal Durations Reveals a Volatile Single-Item Store.

Manohar SG, Husain M.

Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 26;7:1655. eCollection 2016.

3.

Attention to multiple locations is limited by spatial working memory capacity.

Close A, Sapir A, Burnett K, d'Avossa G.

J Vis. 2014 Aug 21;14(9). pii: 17. doi: 10.1167/14.9.17.

PMID:
25146575
4.

The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.

Moher J, Egeth HE.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1590-605. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0358-0.

PMID:
22893004
5.

Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.

Peters JC, Goebel R, Roelfsema PR.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jun;21(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21083.

PMID:
18702589
6.

Perceptual merging contributes to cueing effects.

Kr├╝ger HM, MacInnes WJ, Hunt AR.

J Vis. 2014 Jun 24;14(7). pii: 13. doi: 10.1167/14.7.13.

PMID:
24961250
7.

Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.

Oberauer K, Farrell S, Jarrold C, Pasiecznik K, Greaves M.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):665-85. doi: 10.1037/a0026337. Epub 2011 Dec 5. Review.

PMID:
22141748
8.

Overt and covert object-based attention.

McCarley JS, Kramer AF, Peterson MS.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):751-8.

PMID:
12613679
9.

The whole is indeed more than the sum of its parts: perceptual averaging in the absence of individual item representation.

Corbett JE, Oriet C.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Oct;138(2):289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

PMID:
21903186
10.

Attention-related modulation of sensory-evoked brain activity in a visual search task.

Luck SJ, Fan S, Hillyard SA.

J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):188-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.188.

PMID:
23972153
11.

Set-size effects for spatial frequency change and discrimination in multiple targets.

Wright MJ, Alston L, Popple AV.

Spat Vis. 2002;15(2):157-70.

PMID:
11991572
12.
13.

Statistical processing: computing the average size in perceptual groups.

Chong SC, Treisman A.

Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(7):891-900.

14.

Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.

Narasimhan S, Tripathy SP, Barrett BT.

Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(1):10-27. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.023. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

15.

Exogenous temporal cues enhance recognition memory in an object-based manner.

Ohyama J, Watanabe K.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2157-67. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.8.2157.

PMID:
21097859
16.

State-dependent effects of alcohol on recollective experience, familiarity and awareness of memories.

Duka T, Weissenborn R, Dienes Z.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Jan;153(3):295-306.

PMID:
11271401
17.

Encoding processes and attentional inhibition in directed forgetting.

Marks W, Dulaney CL.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Nov;27(6):1464-73.

PMID:
11713880
18.

Parallel averaging of size is possible but range-limited: a reply to Marchant, Simons, and De Fockert.

Utochkin IS, Tiurina NA.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Feb;146:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

PMID:
24361740
19.

Attention does more than modulate suppressive interactions: attending to multiple items.

Scalf PE, Basak C, Beck DM.

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(2):293-304. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2730-z. Epub 2011 Jun 4.

PMID:
21643719
20.

Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.

Reinitz MT.

Percept Psychophys. 1990 May;47(5):497-505.

PMID:
2349062

Supplemental Content

Support Center