Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 325

1.

Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.

Freitas FG, Bafi AT, Nascente AP, Assunção M, Mazza B, Azevedo LC, Machado FR.

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):402-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes398. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23161359
2.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.

Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, Kao KC, Chen NH, Hsieh MJ, Tsai YH.

Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2810-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b74e.

PMID:
18766099
3.
4.

Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL.

Intensive Care Med. 2005 Apr;31(4):517-23. Epub 2005 Mar 8.

PMID:
15754196
5.

The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.

Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Masson F, Sztark F.

Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):523-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182240054. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

PMID:
21642606
6.

Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.

Oliveira-Costa CD, Friedman G, Vieira SR, Fialkow L.

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jul;67(7):773-8.

7.

Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness.

Vallée F, Richard JC, Mari A, Gallas T, Arsac E, Verlaan PS, Chousterman B, Samii K, Genestal M, Fourcade O.

Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1004-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1478-4. Epub 2009 Apr 4.

PMID:
19347330
8.

Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.

Auler JO Jr, Galas F, Hajjar L, Santos L, Carvalho T, Michard F.

Anesth Analg. 2008 Apr;106(4):1201-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287664.03547.c6.

PMID:
18349193
9.

Pre-ejection period variations predict the fluid responsiveness of septic ventilated patients.

Feissel M, Badie J, Merlani PG, Faller JP, Bendjelid K.

Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2534-9.

PMID:
16276164
10.

Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;162(1):134-8.

PMID:
10903232
11.

Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.

Perner A, Faber T.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Oct;50(9):1068-73. Epub 2006 Aug 25.

PMID:
16939480
12.

Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.

Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):64-8.

PMID:
17080001
13.

Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients.

Feissel M, Teboul JL, Merlani P, Badie J, Faller JP, Bendjelid K.

Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):993-9. Epub 2007 Mar 29.

PMID:
17393139
14.

The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.

Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL.

Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):415-421. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002183.

PMID:
27922879
15.

Influence of intra-abdominal pressure on the specificity of pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness.

Royer P, Bendjelid K, Valentino R, Résière D, Chabartier C, Mehdaoui H.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):994-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000605.

PMID:
25909421
16.

[Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].

Drvar Z, Pavlek M, Drvar V, Tomasević B, Baronica R, Perić M.

Acta Med Croatica. 2013 Dec;67(5):407-14. Croatian.

PMID:
24979881
17.
18.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.

Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;29(2):64-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834b7d82.

PMID:
21946822
19.

The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, Boucau C, Simon R, Hénaine R, Lehot JJ.

Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):513-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318192a36b.

PMID:
19151280
20.

Influence of tidal volume for stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.

Suehiro K, Okutani R.

J Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):777-80. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1200-x. Epub 2011 Jul 9.

PMID:
21744128

Supplemental Content

Support Center