Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 76

1.

Subpopulation-proteomics in prokaryotic populations.

Jahn M, Seifert J, von Bergen M, Schmid A, Bühler B, Müller S.

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Feb;24(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 12. Review.

PMID:
23153572
2.

Label-free relative quantitation of prokaryotic proteomes using the accurate mass and time tag approach.

Hixson KK.

Methods Mol Biol. 2009;492:39-63. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-493-3_3.

PMID:
19241026
3.

Single-cell technologies sharpen up mammalian stem cell research.

Hoppe PS, Coutu DL, Schroeder T.

Nat Cell Biol. 2014 Oct;16(10):919-27. doi: 10.1038/ncb3042. Review.

PMID:
25271480
4.

Cell cycle: proteomics gives it a spin.

Archambault V.

Expert Rev Proteomics. 2005 Aug;2(4):615-25. Review.

PMID:
16097893
5.

The current state of microbial proteomics: where we are and where we want to go.

Chao TC, Hansmeier N.

Proteomics. 2012 Feb;12(4-5):638-50. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100381. Epub 2012 Jan 19. Review.

PMID:
22246737
6.

Concise review: trends in stem cell proteomics.

Baharvand H, Fathi A, van Hoof D, Salekdeh GH.

Stem Cells. 2007 Aug;25(8):1888-903. Epub 2007 May 10. Review.

7.

Quantitative proteomics: a tool to assess cell differentiation.

Vermeulen M, Selbach M.

Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009 Dec;21(6):761-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 1. Review.

PMID:
19800778
8.

MSMSpdbb: providing protein databases of closely related organisms to improve proteomic characterization of prokaryotic microbes.

de Souza GA, Arntzen MØ, Wiker HG.

Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 1;26(5):698-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq004. Epub 2010 Jan 14.

9.

MS-specific noise model reveals the potential of iTRAQ in quantitative proteomics.

Hundertmark C, Fischer R, Reinl T, May S, Klawonn F, Jänsch L.

Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 15;25(8):1004-11. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn551. Epub 2008 Oct 24.

PMID:
18952628
10.

Proteomic profiling of distinct clonal populations of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Mareddy S, Broadbent J, Crawford R, Xiao Y.

J Cell Biochem. 2009 Apr 1;106(5):776-86. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22088. Review.

PMID:
19229859
11.

Application of mass spectrometry in proteomics.

Guerrera IC, Kleiner O.

Biosci Rep. 2005 Feb-Apr;25(1-2):71-93. Review.

PMID:
16222421
12.

Analysis of environmental stress response on the proteome level.

Nesatyy VJ, Suter MJ.

Mass Spectrom Rev. 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):556-74. doi: 10.1002/mas.20177. Review.

PMID:
18553564
13.

Zooming in: fractionation strategies in proteomics.

Stasyk T, Huber LA.

Proteomics. 2004 Dec;4(12):3704-16. Review.

PMID:
15540207
15.

Developments in quantitative mass spectrometry for the analysis of proteome dynamics.

Hughes C, Krijgsveld J.

Trends Biotechnol. 2012 Dec;30(12):668-76. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 27. Review.

PMID:
23107010
16.

[Introduction of proteomic approach to environmental medicine].

Hiyoshi M, Uemura H, Takeda H, Kido H, Arisawa K.

Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2006 Sep;61(4):393-9. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
17025216
17.

Plant proteome analysis by mass spectrometry: principles, problems, pitfalls and recent developments.

Newton RP, Brenton AG, Smith CJ, Dudley E.

Phytochemistry. 2004 Jun;65(11):1449-85. Review.

PMID:
15276445
18.

Mass spectrometry based proteomics in urine biomarker discovery.

Theodorescu D, Mischak H.

World J Urol. 2007 Oct;25(5):435-43. Epub 2007 Aug 17. Review.

PMID:
17703310
19.

Mass spectrometry characterization of plant phosphoproteins.

Nováková K, Sedo O, Zdráhal Z.

Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2011 Mar;12(2):112-25. Review.

PMID:
21348846
20.

Differential proteomic analysis in the study of prokaryotes stress resistance.

Renzone G, D'Ambrosio C, Arena S, Rullo R, Ledda L, Ferrara L, Scaloni A.

Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2005;41(4):459-68. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center