Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 241

1.

Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.

Shofner WP, Campbell J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):EL398-404. doi: 10.1121/1.4757697.

2.

Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-44. doi: 10.1177/1084713813477244. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

3.

Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):3487-501. doi: 10.1121/1.4921603.

4.

Fundamental-frequency discrimination using noise-band-vocoded harmonic complexes in older listeners with normal hearing.

Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Chatterjee M.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Sep;138(3):1687-95. doi: 10.1121/1.4929938.

5.

Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.

Li X, Nie K, Imennov NS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT, Atlas LE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3387-98. doi: 10.1121/1.4756827.

6.

Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.

Anderson S, Skoe E, Chandrasekaran B, Zecker S, Kraus N.

Hear Res. 2010 Dec 1;270(1-2):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

7.

Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.

Phatak SA, Grant KW.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Aug;136(2):859-66. doi: 10.1121/1.4889863.

PMID:
25096119
8.

Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Schvartz KC, Chatterjee M.

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):411-20. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d78dc.

9.

Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.

Stilp CE, Goupell MJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):844-55. doi: 10.1121/1.4906179.

10.

Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.

Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Jan;50(1):2-13. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.505582. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

PMID:
21091261
11.

Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.

Rosen S, Hui SN.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Dec;138(6):3698-702. doi: 10.1121/1.4937605.

PMID:
26723325
12.

Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.

Liu C, Azimi B, Tahmina Q, Hu Y.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):EL378-84. doi: 10.1121/1.4757729.

PMID:
23145698
14.

The effect of language experience on perceptual normalization of Mandarin tones and non-speech pitch contours.

Luo X, Ashmore KB.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jun;135(6):3585-93. doi: 10.1121/1.4874619.

15.

The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.

Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL142-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4737595.

PMID:
22894313
16.

Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.

Eaves JM, Summerfield AQ, Kitterick PT.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul;130(1):501-7. doi: 10.1121/1.3592237.

PMID:
21786915
17.

The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Fogerty D, Kewley-Port D, Humes LE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1667-78. doi: 10.1121/1.4739463.

18.

The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.

Steinmetzger K, Rosen S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Dec;138(6):3586-99. doi: 10.1121/1.4936945.

PMID:
26723315
19.

The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.

Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):EL277-83. doi: 10.1121/1.4748343.

PMID:
23039565
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center