Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography to assess coronary artery bypass grafts--comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

Lee YW, Yang CC, Mok GS, Law WY, Su CT, Wu TH.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049212. Epub 2012 Nov 7. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2013;8(6). doi:10.1371/annotation/2d9c062e-1454-435d-b74a-4ce2cdaf5651.

2.

Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates.

Hou Y, Yue Y, Guo W, Feng G, Yu T, Li G, Vembar M, Olszewski ME, Guo Q.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;28(1):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9760-7. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

PMID:
21153709
3.

Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.

Lee JH, Chun EJ, Choi SI, Vembar M, Lim C, Park KH, Choi DJ.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jun;27(5):657-67. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9904-4. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

PMID:
21678128
4.

Retrospective gating vs. prospective triggering for noninvasive coronary angiography: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose using a 256-slice CT scanner with 270 ms gantry rotation.

Law WY, Yang CC, Chen LK, Huang TC, Lu KM, Wu TH, Mok GS.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Jan;18(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.013.

PMID:
21145027
6.

Low dose high-pitch spiral acquisition 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency.

Goetti R, Leschka S, Baumüller S, Plass A, Wieser M, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Falk V, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Feuchtner G.

Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun;45(6):324-30. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa47e.

PMID:
20404735
7.

Dose and image quality comparison between prospectively gated axial and retrospectively gated helical coronary CT angiography.

Hlaihel C, Boussel L, Cochet H, Roch JA, Coulon P, Walker MJ, Douek PC.

Br J Radiol. 2011 Jan;84(997):51-7. doi: 10.1259/bjr/13222537.

8.

Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates.

Stolzmann P, Goetti R, Baumueller S, Plass A, Falk V, Scheffel H, Feuchtner G, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Leschka S.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

PMID:
20079993
9.

Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique.

Klass O, Jeltsch M, Feuerlein S, Brunner H, Nagel HD, Walker MJ, Brambs HJ, Hoffmann MH.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):829-36. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1222-4. Epub 2008 Nov 15.

PMID:
19011864
10.
11.
12.

Image quality and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: influence of imaging direction with 64-slice dual-source CT.

Lee SK, Jung JI, Ko JM, Lee HG.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Mar-Apr;8(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 11.

PMID:
24661825
13.

Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography--influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility.

Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Kobza R, Verdun FR, Seifert B, Marincek B, Boehm T.

Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):568-77. Epub 2004 Jun 23.

14.

Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

Feng Q, Yin Y, Hua X, Zhu R, Hua J, Xu J.

Clin Radiol. 2010 Oct;65(10):809-14. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

PMID:
20797467
15.
16.
17.

Infant cardiac CT angiography with 64-slice and 256-slice CT: comparison of radiation dose and image quality using a pediatric phantom.

Lee YW, Yang CC, Mok GS, Wu TH.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049609. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

18.

[Diagnostic performance of prospective versus retrospective electrocardiogram-gated 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography].

Yuan XC, Qiu X, Wang XZ, Liao WL, Chen Q, Deng HY.

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2008 Nov;36(11):985-8. Chinese.

PMID:
19102910
19.

Objective and subjective image quality with prospectively gated versus ECG-controlled tube current modulation using 256-slice computed tomographic angiography.

Abazid R, Smettei O, Sayed S, Harby FA, Habeeb AA, Saqqa HA, Mergania S, Selvanayagam JB.

J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct;27(4):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 3.

20.

Post-CABG coronary CT angiography: radiation dose and graft image quality in retrospective versus prospective ECG gating.

Chazen JL, Prince MR, Yip R, Min JK, Weinsaft JW, Henschke CI, Cham MD.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 12.

PMID:
20542451

Supplemental Content

Support Center