Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 197

1.

Assessment of nasal obstruction: correlation between subjective and objective techniques.

Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Bartra J, Muñoz-Cano R, Sánchez-López J, Serrano C, Mullol J, Alobid I, Sastre J, Picado C, Valero A.

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2013 Nov-Dec;41(6):397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

PMID:
23140913
2.

Correlations between acoustic rhinometry, subjective symptoms, and endoscopic findings in symptomatic children with nasal obstruction.

Isaac A, Major M, Witmans M, Alrajhi Y, Flores-Mir C, Major P, Alsufyani N, Korayem M, El-Hakim H.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jun;141(6):550-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0468.

PMID:
25856660
3.

Does nasal obstruction mean that the nose is obstructed?

Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvåg SK.

Laryngoscope. 2008 Aug;118(8):1476-81. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318173a025.

PMID:
18475207
4.

Measurements of nasal airflow and patency: a critical review with emphasis on the use of peak nasal inspiratory flow in daily practice.

Ottaviano G, Fokkens WJ.

Allergy. 2016 Feb;71(2):162-74. doi: 10.1111/all.12778. Review.

PMID:
26447365
5.

Surgery of the external nasal valve: the correlation between subjective and objective measurements.

Menger DJ, Swart KM, Nolst Trenité GJ, Georgalas C, Grolman W.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2014 Jun;39(3):150-5. doi: 10.1111/coa.12243.

PMID:
24725912
6.

Validation of polyvinylidene fluoride nasal sensor to assess nasal obstruction in comparison with subjective technique.

Roopa Manjunatha G, Mahapatra DR, Prakash S, Rajanna K.

Am J Otolaryngol. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

PMID:
25447932
7.

4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR)--basics and practice 2010.

Vogt K, Jalowayski AA, Althaus W, Cao C, Han D, Hasse W, Hoffrichter H, Mösges R, Pallanch J, Shah-Hosseini K, Peksis K, Wernecke KD, Zhang L, Zaporoshenko P.

Rhinol Suppl. 2010;(21):1-50.

PMID:
20649107
8.

Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty.

Tompos T, Garai T, Zemplén B, Gerlinger I.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Dec;267(12):1887-91. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1278-z. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

PMID:
20544355
9.

Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and the sensation of nasal patency: a correlative study.

Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, Barreto SM, Szalai JP, Zamel N.

J Otolaryngol. 1994 Dec;23(6):454-8.

PMID:
7897780
10.

Objective measurements differ for perception of left and right nasal obstruction.

Ng TY, Chen YF, Tsai MH, Huang KH, Tai CJ.

Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013 Feb;40(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

PMID:
22709573
11.

Visual analog scale (VAS) and nasal obstruction in persistent allergic rhinitis.

Ciprandi G, Mora F, Cassano M, Gallina AM, Mora R.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;141(4):527-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.06.083.

PMID:
19786224
12.

Objective and subjective assessments of nasal obstruction in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis.

Mendes AI, Wandalsen GF, Solé D.

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2012 Sep-Oct;88(5):389-95. doi: doi:10.2223/JPED.2213. Epub 2012 Sep 22. English, Portuguese.

13.

Nasal congestion index: A measure for nasal obstruction.

Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvåg SK.

Laryngoscope. 2009 Aug;119(8):1628-32. doi: 10.1002/lary.20505.

PMID:
19507219
14.

Nasal cavity size, airway resistance, and subjective sensation after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective longitudinal study.

Magnusson A, Bjerklin K, Nilsson P, Jönsson F, Marcusson A.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):641-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.11.024.

PMID:
22051484
15.

Evaluation of nasal patency: comparison of patient and clinician assessments with rhinomanometry.

Panagou P, Loukides S, Tsipra S, Syrigou K, Anastasakis C, Kalogeropoulos N.

Acta Otolaryngol. 1998 Nov;118(6):847-51.

PMID:
9870632
16.

[Significance of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in the evaluation of submucous correction of nasal septum and submucous resection of inferior turbinate].

Zhao W, Sun JW, Wang YL, Guo T.

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;47(2):132-6. Chinese.

PMID:
22455812
17.

The importance of side difference in nasal obstruction and rhinomanometry: a retrospective correlation of symptoms and rhinomanometry in 1000 patients.

Thulesius HL, Cervin A, Jessen M.

Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02420.x.

PMID:
22136145
18.

Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.

Kim CS, Moon BK, Jung DH, Min YG.

Auris Nasus Larynx. 1998 Jan;25(1):45-8.

PMID:
9512794
19.

[Relationship between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry].

Wang X, Shu C, Chen J, Peng Z, Shan P.

Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jun;25(11):486-8. Chinese.

PMID:
21845824
20.

Evaluating the sensation of nasal obstruction with acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.

Tai CF, Ho KY, Hasegawa M.

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1998 Sep;14(9):548-53.

PMID:
9796198

Supplemental Content

Support Center