Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 63

1.

GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes.

Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, Patrick D, Furukawa TA, Johnston BC, Karanicolas P, Akl EA, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Kupper LL, Martin SL, Meerpohl JJ, Alonso-Coello P, Christensen R, Schunemann HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Oct 30. Review. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):475.

PMID:
23116689
2.

[GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles - continuous outcomes].

Schell LK, Meerpohl JJ, Gartlehner G, Langer G, Perleth M, Schünemann HJ.

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(5-6):333-47. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jul 2. German.

PMID:
25066353
3.

[GRADE guidelines: 12. Developing Summary of Findings tables - dichotomous outcomes].

Langer G, Meerpohl JJ, Perleth M, Gartlehner G, Schünemann H.

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(9-10):646-64. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.10.034. Epub 2013 Nov 9. German.

PMID:
24315336
4.

GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, Helfand M, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Norris S, Meerpohl J, Djulbegovic B, Alonso-Coello P, Post PN, Busse JW, Glasziou P, Christensen R, Schünemann HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):158-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 May 18. Review.

PMID:
22609141
5.

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.

Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

PMID:
21195583
6.

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

PMID:
21194891
7.

GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes.

Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Akl EA, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Apr 27. Review.

PMID:
22542023
8.

Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Guyatt G, Akl EA, Oxman A, Wilson K, Puhan MA, Wilt T, Gutterman D, Woodhead M, Antman EM, Schünemann HJ; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Integrating and Coordinating Efforts in COPD Guideline Development.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST. Review.

PMID:
23256168
9.

Pooling health-related quality of life outcomes in meta-analysis-a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability.

Thorlund K, Walter SD, Johnston BC, Furukawa TA, Guyatt GH.

Res Synth Methods. 2011 Sep;2(3):188-203. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.46. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

PMID:
26061786
10.

The role of clinical guidelines, policies and stewardship.

Natsch S, van der Meer JW.

J Hosp Infect. 2003 Mar;53(3):172-6. Review.

PMID:
12623316
11.

[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].

Langer G, Meerpohl JJ, Perleth M, Gartlehner G, Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, Schünemann H.

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6. German.

PMID:
22818160
12.

Evidence-based guidelines: extrapolation, adherence, and outcome.

Sue DY.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):1038-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
12834529
13.
14.

Adherence to practice guidelines: improving quality of care and patient outcomes.

Burns H, Foley SM.

J Prof Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;21(3):137-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
16021555
15.

Deciding what type of evidence and outcomes to include in guidelines: article 5 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Wilt TJ, Guyatt G, Kunz R, Macnee W, Puhan MA, Viegi G, Woodhead M, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Integrating and Coordinating Efforts in COPD Guideline Development.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):243-50. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-058ST. Review.

PMID:
23256166
16.

GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence.

Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman AD, Lord J, Sisk J, Ruiz F, Hill S, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Helfand M, Harbour R, Davoli M, Amato L, Liberati A, Schünemann HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):140-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 Aug 3. Review.

PMID:
22863410
17.

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.

Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lelgemann M, Lethaby A, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group.

Allergy. 2009 May;64(5):669-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x. Review.

18.

Assessing guidelines for use in family practice.

Rosser WW, Davis D, Gilbart E; Guideline Advisory Committee.

J Fam Pract. 2001 Nov;50(11):969-73.

PMID:
11711013
19.

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system.

Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr; GRADE Working Group.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Mar 23;5(1):25.

20.

The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study.

Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Beyene J.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 May 21;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-32.

Supplemental Content

Support Center