Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 78

1.

A systematic approach to magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of epiphyseal lesions.

Thawait SK, Thawait GK, Frassica FJ, Andreisek G, Carrino JA, Chhabra A.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Apr;31(3):418-31. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

PMID:
23102949
2.

Magnetic resonance imaging features of the discrete epiphyseal radiolucency: a problem-solving approach to differential diagnosis.

Mellado JM, Bencardino JT, del Palomar LP.

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):243-61. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.08.003. Review.

PMID:
18823866
3.

Magnetic resonance imaging and differential diagnosis of epiphyseal osteonecrosis.

Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B.

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001;5(1):57-67. Review.

PMID:
11371336
4.

Early irreversible osteonecrosis versus transient lesions of the femoral condyles: prognostic value of subchondral bone and marrow changes on MR imaging.

Lecouvet FE, van de Berg BC, Maldague BE, Lebon CJ, Jamart J, Saleh M, Noël H, Malghem J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):71-7.

PMID:
9423603
5.

Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions.

Wu HT, Chang CY, Chang H, Yen CC, Cheng H, Chen PC, Chiou HJ.

J Chin Med Assoc. 2012 Apr;75(4):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

6.

MR imaging of epiphyseal lesions of the knee: current concepts, challenges, and controversies.

Lecouvet FE, Malghem J, Maldague BE, Vande Berg BC.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;43(4):655-72, vii-viii. Review.

PMID:
15893529
7.
8.

Idiopathic and diabetic skeletal muscle necrosis: evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.

Kattapuram TM, Suri R, Rosol MS, Rosenberg AE, Kattapuram SV.

Skeletal Radiol. 2005 Apr;34(4):203-9. Epub 2005 Feb 8.

PMID:
15700181
9.

Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.

Yoshizako T, Wada A, Hayashi T, Uchida K, Sumura M, Uchida N, Kitagaki H, Igawa M.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1207-13. doi: 10.1080/02841850802508959.

PMID:
19031184
10.

Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor.

Rupp RE, Ebraheim NA, Coombs RJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Dec 1;20(23):2499-503; discussion 2504.

PMID:
8610244
11.

Contribution of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Xu PJ, Yan FH, Wang JH, Shan Y, Ji Y, Chen CZ.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Jul;34(4):506-12. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181da3671.

PMID:
20657216
12.

Differential diagnosis in variants or abnormalities of the hip on MRI.

Schedel H, Wicht L, Mäurer J, Zellner A, Felix R.

Bildgebung. 1994 Mar;61(1):20-4.

PMID:
8193512
15.

Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infections: systematic diagnostic assessment and key points.

Soldatos T, Durand DJ, Subhawong TK, Carrino JA, Chhabra A.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1434-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.022. Epub 2012 Aug 11. Review.

PMID:
22884398
16.

[Diagnostic imaging and therapy of chondroblastoma].

Nickel J, Meyer DR, Geufke P, Andresen R.

Rontgenpraxis. 2002;54(6):224-31. German.

PMID:
12174446
17.

Whole-body MRI of multiple myeloma: comparison of different MRI sequences in assessment of different growth patterns.

Weininger M, Lauterbach B, Knop S, Pabst T, Kenn W, Hahn D, Beissert M.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Feb;69(2):339-45. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

PMID:
18096344
18.

Is gadolinium necessary for MRI follow-up evaluation of cystic lesions in the pancreas? Preliminary results.

Macari M, Lee T, Kim S, Jacobs S, Megibow AJ, Hajdu C, Babb J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):159-64. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1068.

PMID:
19098196
19.

[Abdominal and pelvic segmented T1-weighted echo-planar imaging and MRI. Comparison with T1-TSE and T2-UTSE sequences].

Maubon A, Berger V, Aubas P, Ferru JM, Rouanet JP.

J Radiol. 1999 Mar;80(3):291-6. French.

20.

Application of classification trees for the qualitative differentiation of focal liver lesions suspicious for metastasis in gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR imaging.

Schelhorn J, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Burmeister HP, Kaiser WA, Baltzer PA.

Rofo. 2012 Sep;184(9):788-94. Epub 2012 May 22.

PMID:
22618476

Supplemental Content

Support Center