Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 89

1.

Use of randomisation in clinical trials: a survey of UK practice.

McPherson GC, Campbell MK, Elbourne DR.

Trials. 2012 Oct 26;13:198. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-198.

2.

Investigating the relationship between predictability and imbalance in minimisation: a simulation study.

McPherson GC, Campbell MK, Elbourne DR.

Trials. 2013 Mar 27;14:86. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-86.

3.

Risk of selection bias in randomised trials.

Kahan BC, Rehal S, Cro S.

Trials. 2015 Sep 10;16:405. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0920-x. Review.

4.

Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.

Robinson EJ, Kerr CE, Stevens AJ, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, Beck SR, Rowley MG.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(8):1-192, iii-iv.

5.

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.

Odgaard-Jensen J, Vist GE, Timmer A, Kunz R, Akl EA, Sch√ľnemann H, Briel M, Nordmann AJ, Pregno S, Oxman AD.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;(4):MR000012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000012.pub3. Review.

PMID:
21491415
6.
7.

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.

Kunz R, Vist G, Oxman AD.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000012. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(4):MR000012.

PMID:
17443633
8.

Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice.

Schulz KF, Grimes DA.

Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):515-9. Review.

PMID:
11853818
9.

Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing.

Schulz KF, Grimes DA.

Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):966-70.

PMID:
11918933
10.

Sequence balance minimisation: minimising with unequal treatment allocations.

Madurasinghe VW.

Trials. 2017 May 3;18(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1942-3.

11.

Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study.

Rovers MM, Straatman H, Zielhuis GA.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16(12):1123-9.

PMID:
11484801
12.

IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.

Kasturi J, Geisler JG, Liu J, Kirchner T, Amaratunga D, Lubomirski M.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.12.009. Epub 2010 Dec 25.

PMID:
21187163
13.

The use of unequal randomisation ratios in clinical trials: a review.

Dumville JC, Hahn S, Miles JN, Torgerson DJ.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2006 Feb;27(1):1-12. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Review.

PMID:
16236557
14.

Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.

Pitt V, Lowe D, Hill S, Prictor M, Hetrick SE, Ryan R, Berends L.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23543537
15.

Sequential balancing: a simple method for treatment allocation in clinical trials.

Borm GF, Hoogendoorn EH, den Heijer M, Zielhuis GA.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Dec;26(6):637-45. Epub 2005 Oct 14.

PMID:
16226925
16.

Adjusting for multiple prognostic factors in the analysis of randomised trials.

Kahan BC, Morris TP.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jul 31;13:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-99.

17.
18.

Random allocation in controlled clinical trials: a review.

Egbewale BE.

J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;17(2):248-53. Review.

19.

Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Corbett MS, Higgins JP, Woolacott NF.

Res Synth Methods. 2014 Mar;5(1):79-85. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1090. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

PMID:
26054027
20.

Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates.

Pond GR.

Br J Cancer. 2011 May 24;104(11):1711-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.157. Epub 2011 May 3.

Supplemental Content

Support Center