Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 176

1.

An analysis of survey data by size of the breeding herd for the reproductive management practices of North American sow farms.

Knox RV, Rodriguez Zas SL, Sloter NL, McNamara KA, Gall TJ, Levis DG, Safranski TJ, Singleton WL.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Jan;91(1):433-45. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5189. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

2.

Comparison of artificial insemination with natural mating on smallholder farms in Thailand, and the effects of boar stimulation and distance of semen delivery on sow reproductive performance.

Am-in N, Tantasuparuk W, Techakumphu M.

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Jun;42(5):921-4. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9508-3. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

PMID:
20012195
3.

Duration of estrus in relation to reproduction results in pigs on commercial farms.

Steverink DW, Soede NM, Groenland GJ, van Schie FW, Noordhuizen JP, Kemp B.

J Anim Sci. 1999 Apr;77(4):801-9.

5.

Effect of housing system and boar exposure on estrus expression in weaned sows.

Knox RV, Breen SM, Willenburg KL, Roth S, Miller GM, Ruggiero KM, Rodriguez-Zas SL.

J Anim Sci. 2004 Oct;82(10):3088-93.

6.

Effect of PG600 and adjusted mating times on reproductive performance in weaned sows.

Breen SM, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Knox RV.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Jun;93(1-2):157-64. Epub 2005 Jul 27.

PMID:
16054308
7.

Effect of day of mixing gestating sows on measures of reproductive performance and animal welfare.

Knox R, Salak-Johnson J, Hopgood M, Greiner L, Connor J.

J Anim Sci. 2014 Apr;92(4):1698-707. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6432. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

8.

Reproductive performance among sows group-housed during late lactation.

Hultén F, Lundeheim N, Dalin AM, Einarsson S.

Acta Vet Scand. 1998;39(2):237-50.

PMID:
9787487
12.

Uterine insemination with a standard AI dose in a sow pool system.

Peltoniemi OA, Alm K, Andersson M.

Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Jun;44(3):414-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01094.x. Epub 2008 Nov 9.

PMID:
19000227
13.

Effects of feeding schedule on body condition, aggressiveness, and reproductive failure in group-housed sows.

Schneider JD, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Nelssen JL, Derouchey JM, Goodband RD.

J Anim Sci. 2007 Dec;85(12):3462-9. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

14.

Use of frozen-thawed semen aggravates the summer-autumn infertility of artificially inseminated weaned sows in the Mediterranean region.

Bolarín A, Hernández M, Vazquez JM, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Martinez EA, Roca J.

J Anim Sci. 2009 Dec;87(12):3967-75. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1941. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

15.

Control of pig reproduction in a breeding programme.

Martinat-Botté F, Bariteau F, Badouard B, Terqui M.

J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1985;33:211-28. Review.

PMID:
3910826
16.

Effect of live weight development and reproduction in first parity on reproductive performance of second parity sows.

Hoving LL, Soede NM, Graat EA, Feitsma H, Kemp B.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2010 Oct;122(1-2):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

PMID:
20727690
17.

Influence of mating frequency on sow reproductive performance.

Xue J, Dial GD, Trigg T, Davies P, King VL.

J Anim Sci. 1998 Dec;76(12):2962-6.

18.

Accuracy of sow culling classifications reported by lay personnel on commercial swine farms.

Knauer M, Karriker LA, Baas TJ, Johnson C, Stalder KJ.

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Aug 1;231(3):433-6.

PMID:
17669047
19.

Dissimilarities in sows' ovarian status at the insemination time could explain differences in fertility between farms when frozen-thawed semen is used.

Bolarín A, Roca J, Rodríguez-Martínez H, Hernández M, Vázquez JM, Martínez EA.

Theriogenology. 2006 Feb;65(3):669-80. Epub 2005 Jul 12.

PMID:
16019059
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center