Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 131

1.

Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients.

Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, Bergeron F, Beynon A, Burke E, Dillier N, Dowell R, Fraysse B, Gallégo S, Govaerts PJ, Green K, Huber AM, Kleine-Punte A, Maat B, Marx M, Mawman D, Mosnier I, O'Connor AF, O'Leary S, Rousset A, Schauwers K, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sterkers O, Terranti A, Truy E, Van de Heyning P, Venail F, Vincent C, Lazard DS.

Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36-47. doi: 10.1159/000343189. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

2.

Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venail F, Van de Heyning P, Truy E, Sterkers O, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H, Schauwers K, O'Leary S, Mawman D, Maat B, Kleine-Punte A, Huber AM, Green K, Govaerts PJ, Fraysse B, Dowell R, Dillier N, Burke E, Beynon A, Bergeron F, Başkent D, Artières F, Blamey PJ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048739. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

3.

Speech perception performance as a function of age at implantation among postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.

Mahmoud AF, Ruckenstein MJ.

Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):e286-91. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000581.

PMID:
25226375
4.

Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.

Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Brightwell T, Venick H.

Laryngoscope. 2004 Oct;114(10):1747-52.

PMID:
15454765
5.

A Retrospective Multicenter Study Comparing Speech Perception Outcomes for Bilateral Implantation and Bimodal Rehabilitation.

Blamey PJ, Maat B, Başkent D, Mawman D, Burke E, Dillier N, Beynon A, Kleine-Punte A, Govaerts PJ, Skarzynski PH, Huber AM, Sterkers-Artières F, Van de Heyning P, O'Leary S, Fraysse B, Green K, Sterkers O, Venail F, Skarzynski H, Vincent C, Truy E, Dowell R, Bergeron F, Lazard DS.

Ear Hear. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):408-16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000150.

6.

The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants.

Moon IJ, Kim EY, Jeong JO, Chung WH, Cho YS, Hong SH.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):739-45. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1699-3. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

PMID:
21739091
7.

The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.

Cosetti MK, Friedmann DR, Zhu BZ, Heman-Ackah SE, Fang Y, Keller RG, Shapiro WH, Roland JT Jr, Waltzman SB.

Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):516-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182785210.

PMID:
23449440
8.

Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: surgical and audiological outcome.

Migirov L, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Drendel M, Hildesheimer M, Kronenberg J.

Gerontology. 2010;56(2):123-8. doi: 10.1159/000235864. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

PMID:
19713692
9.

Cochlear implantation in older adults.

Lin FR, Chien WW, Li L, Clarrett DM, Niparko JK, Francis HW.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2012 Sep;91(5):229-41. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e31826b145a.

10.

The impact of cochlear implantation on speech understanding, subjective hearing performance, and tinnitus perception in patients with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss.

Távora-Vieira D, Marino R, Acharya A, Rajan GP.

Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):430-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000707.

PMID:
25594387
11.

Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.

Park E, Shipp DB, Chen JM, Nedzelski JM, Lin VY.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(10):637-43. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.10.2.

PMID:
22212763
12.

Cochlear implantation in Ménière's disease patients.

McRackan TR, Gifford RH, Kahue CN, Dwyer R, Labadie RF, Wanna GB, Haynes DS, Bennett ML.

Otol Neurotol. 2014 Mar;35(3):421-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000247.

PMID:
24492131
13.

Cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral Ménière's syndrome.

Lustig LR, Yeagle J, Niparko JK, Minor LB.

Otol Neurotol. 2003 May;24(3):397-403.

PMID:
12806291
14.

Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: variables affecting auditory performance.

Carlson ML, Breen JT, Driscoll CL, Link MJ, Neff BA, Gifford RH, Beatty CW.

Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jul;33(5):853-62. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318254fba5.

PMID:
22664900
15.

Speech recognition ability as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients.

Shea JJ 3rd, Domico EH, Orchik DJ.

Laryngoscope. 1990 Mar;100(3):223-6.

PMID:
2308444
16.

Predicting speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness or highly asymmetric hearing loss.

Kitterick PT, Lucas L.

Cochlear Implants Int. 2016 Apr;17 Suppl 1:51-4. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1155806.

PMID:
27099112
17.

Long-term speech and language outcomes in prelingually deaf children, adolescents and young adults who received cochlear implants in childhood.

Ruffin CV, Kronenberger WG, Colson BG, Henning SC, Pisoni DB.

Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(5):289-96. doi: 10.1159/000353405. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

18.

Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.

Morris LG, Mallur PS, Roland JT Jr, Waltzman SB, Lalwani AK.

Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jan;28(1):25-30.

PMID:
17195742
19.

Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients.

Lenarz M, Sönmez H, Joseph G, Büchner A, Lenarz T.

Laryngoscope. 2012 Jun;122(6):1361-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.23232. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

PMID:
22539093
20.

Speech perception in congenitally deaf children receiving cochlear implants in the first year of life.

Tajudeen BA, Waltzman SB, Jethanamest D, Svirsky MA.

Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1254-60. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f2f475.

Supplemental Content

Support Center