Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 198

1.

Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.

Zigler JE, Glenn J, Delamarter RB.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Dec;17(6):504-11. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE11717. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

PMID:
23082849
2.

Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.

Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2510-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af2622.

PMID:
19927100
4.

Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Results of Activ L Total Disk Replacement at 1- to 3-Year Follow-up.

Lu S, Kong C, Hai Y, Kang N, Zang L, Wang Y, Yuan Y.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Nov;28(9):E544-50. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000237.

PMID:
25532603
5.

Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.

Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2905-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b84ae.

PMID:
18246016
6.

Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.

Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Jackson RJ, Bae HW, Hoffman GA, Gaede SE, Danielson GO 3rd, Gordon C, Stone MB.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jan;22(1):15-25. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13953.

PMID:
25380538
7.

Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.

Hou Y, Liu Y, Yuan W, Wang X, Chen H, Yang L, Zhang Y.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

PMID:
24076441
8.

Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.

Siepe CJ, Heider F, Wiechert K, Hitzl W, Ishak B, Mayer MH.

Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1417-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.028. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

PMID:
24448028
9.

ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.

Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 1;38(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318278eb38.

PMID:
23080427
10.

The effect of a mismatched center of rotation on the clinical outcomes and flexion-extension range of motion: lumbar total disk replacement using mobidisc at a 5.5-year follow-up.

Lee CS, Lee DH, Hwang CJ, Kim H, Noh H.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 May;27(3):148-53. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318254e82b.

PMID:
22525508
11.

Effect of total lumbar disc replacement on lumbosacral lordosis.

Kasliwal MK, Deutsch H.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Oct;25(7):370-3.

PMID:
21738074
12.

Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.

Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO 3rd, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zuchermann J, Balderston R, Kitchel S, Foley K, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue J, Yuan H, Herkowitz H, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163.

PMID:
17495770
13.

Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.

Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

PMID:
25555050
14.

Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.

Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):721-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc.

PMID:
20543765
15.

Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.

Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

PMID:
25036218
16.

Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.

Demetropoulos CK, Sengupta DK, Knaub MA, Wiater BP, Abjornson C, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 1;35(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c4eb9a.

PMID:
20042953
17.

Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute.

Park CK, Ryu KS, Lee KY, Lee HJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 15;37(8):672-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ecd85.

PMID:
21857395
18.
19.

Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study.

Strube P, Putzier M, Streitparth F, Hoff EK, Hartwig T.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):25-31. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14997. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

PMID:
26360146
20.

Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.

Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Gaede SE, Rashbaum RF, Nunley PD, Peterson DL, Stokes JK.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):532-45. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

PMID:
24010901

Supplemental Content

Support Center