Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 486

1.

Do older adults have social lifestyles that place fewer demands on hearing?

Wu YH, Bentler RA.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Oct;23(9):697-711. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.9.4.

PMID:
23072962
2.

Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss.

Banh J, Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):81-91; quiz 139-40. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.2.2.

PMID:
22353676
3.

Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Wu YH, Stangl E, Zhang X, Bentler RA.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(10):872-84. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15034.

4.

Testing assumptions: "do older adults have social lifestyles that place fewer demands on hearing?".

Jacobson G.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Oct;23(9):672. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.9.1. No abstract available.

PMID:
23072959
5.

The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.

Glyde H, Cameron S, Dillon H, Hickson L, Seeto M.

Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):15-28. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182617f94.

PMID:
22941406
6.

The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.

Hornsby BW.

Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):523-34. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8.

PMID:
23426091
7.

The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.

Li L, Huang J, Wu X, Qi JG, Schneider BA.

Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):273-86. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318198703d.

PMID:
19194287
8.

Effect of age on directional microphone hearing aid benefit and preference.

Wu YH.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):78-89.

PMID:
20166310
9.

The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.

Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T.

Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):262-72. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181987063.

PMID:
19194286
10.
11.

Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.

Krull V, Humes LE, Kidd GR.

Ear Hear. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):e14-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0c27.

12.

Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.

Wu YH, Bentler RA.

Ear Hear. 2010 Feb;31(1):35-46. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bc769b.

PMID:
19773657
13.

Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.

Leigh-Paffenroth ED, Elangovan S.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):393-404. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.2.

PMID:
21993047
14.

Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.

Ricketts TA, Henry PP, Hornsby BW.

Ear Hear. 2005 Oct;26(5):473-86.

PMID:
16230897
15.

Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.

Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, Dyrlund O.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2004 May;15(5):365-96.

PMID:
15506498
16.
17.

Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.

Mueller HG, Hornsby BW, Weber JE.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;19(10):758-73.

PMID:
19358456
18.

The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.

Wilson RH, Watts KL.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):92-6. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.2.3.

PMID:
22353677
19.

Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?

Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1542-58. doi: 10.1121/1.3608122.

PMID:
21895093
20.

Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.

Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Alexander G.

Ear Hear. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):e360-e376.

PMID:
27438869

Supplemental Content

Support Center