Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 189

1.

Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay.

Bundhoo SS, Earp E, Ivanauskiene T, Kunadian V, Freeman P, Edwards R, Kinnaird TD, Zaman A, Anderson RA.

Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.029.

PMID:
23067903
2.

The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.

Rathore S, Roberts E, Hakeem AR, Pauriah M, Beaumont A, Morris JL.

J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Aug;22(4):336-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00479.x.

PMID:
19689657
3.

Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.

Baker NC, O'Connell EW, Htun WW, Sun H, Green SM, Skelding KA, Blankenship JC, Scott TD, Berger PB.

Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

PMID:
25262264
4.

A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).

Michael TT, Alomar M, Papayannis A, Mogabgab O, Patel VG, Rangan BV, Luna M, Hastings JL, Grodin J, Abdullah S, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

5.

Crossover from radial to femoral access during a challenging percutaneous coronary intervention can make the difference between success and failure.

Cooper L, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Oct-Dec;11(4):266.e5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2010.04.002.

PMID:
20934669
6.

A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study.

Ziakas A, Klinke P, Mildenberger R, Fretz E, Williams M, Della Siega A, Kinloch D, Hilton D.

Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005;7(2):93-6.

PMID:
16093218
8.

Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.

Becher T, Behnes M, Ünsal M, Baumann S, El-Battrawy I, Fastner C, Kuschyk J, Papavassiliu T, Hoffmann U, Mashayekhi K, Borggrefe M, Akin I.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):505-509. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

PMID:
27350417
9.

[Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome].

Gao L, Liu Y, Xue Q, Tian J, Wang Y.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jul 8;94(26):2025-9. Chinese.

PMID:
25312663
10.

A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.

Rao SV, Hess CN, Barham B, Aberle LH, Anstrom KJ, Patel TB, Jorgensen JP, Mazzaferri EL Jr, Jolly SS, Jacobs A, Newby LK, Gibson CM, Kong DF, Mehran R, Waksman R, Gilchrist IC, McCourt BJ, Messenger JC, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, Krucoff MW.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):857-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.007.

11.

Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.

Georges JL, Belle L, Meunier L, Dechery T, Khalifé K, Pecheux M, Elhaddad S, Amabile N, Pansieri M, Ballout J, Marchand X, Rouault G, Leddet P, Nugue O, Lucke N, Cattan S; RAY’ACT Investigators.

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Mar;110(3):179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.09.002. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

PMID:
28117244
12.

Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).

Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, Baklanov DV, Kim LK, Wong SC, Minutello RM, Messenger JC, Moussa I, Garratt KN, Piana RN, Hillegass WB, Cohen MG, Gilchrist IC, Rao SV.

Circulation. 2013 Jun 11;127(23):2295-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536.

13.

Patients undergoing PCI from the femoral route by default radial operators are at high risk of vascular access-site complications.

Rafie IM, Uddin MM, Ossei-Gerning N, Anderson RA, Kinnaird TD.

EuroIntervention. 2014 Feb;9(10):1189-94. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I10A200.

14.

Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial.

Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Steg PG, Natarajan MK, Cheema AN, Rao SV, Cantor WJ, Džavík V, Budaj A, Sheth T, Valentin V, Fung A, Widimsky P, Ferrari E, Gao P, Jedrzejowski B, Mehta SR; RIVAL Investigators.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016.

15.

Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Amin AP, House JA, Safley DM, Chhatriwalla AK, Giersiefen H, Bremer A, Hamon M, Baklanov DV, Aluko A, Wohns D, Mathias DW, Applegate RA, Cohen DJ, Marso SP.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

16.

Safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the Veterans Affairs CART program.

Aggarwal V, Stanislawski MA, Maddox TM, Nallamothu BK, Grunwald G, Adams JC, Ho PM, Rao SV, Casserly IP, Rumsfeld JS, Brilakis ES, Tsai TT.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 28;64(17):1825-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1207. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

17.

Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, Schweizer M, Blevins A, Girotra S, Horwitz PA.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010. Review.

18.

A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

Rathore S, Hakeem A, Pauriah M, Roberts E, Beaumont A, Morris JL.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun 1;73(7):883-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21922.

PMID:
19455660
19.

Long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft lesions: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.

Hougaard M, Thayssen P, Kaltoft A, Tilsted HH, Maeng M, Lassen JF, Thuesen L, Okkels Jensen L.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):1035-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25279. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

PMID:
24311384
20.

Radiation exposure during cardiac catheterisation is similar for both femoral and radial approaches.

Gray B, Klimis H, Inam S, Ariyathna N, Kumar S, Bailey B, Patel S.

Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Mar;24(3):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.09.022. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

PMID:
25456214

Supplemental Content

Support Center