Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 95

1.

Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial.

Edlin R, Tubeuf S, Achten J, Parsons N, Costa M.

BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 12;2(5). pii: e001162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001162. Print 2012.

2.

Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Costa ML, Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Foguet P, Prakash U, Griffin DR; Young Adult Hip Arthroplasty Team.

BMJ. 2012 Apr 19;344:e2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2147.

3.

Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.

Clarke A, Pulikottil-Jacob R, Grove A, Freeman K, Mistry H, Tsertsvadze A, Connock M, Court R, Kandala NB, Costa M, Suri G, Metcalfe D, Crowther M, Morrow S, Johnson S, Sutcliffe P.

Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(10):1-668, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19100. Review.

4.

A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different knee prostheses: the Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT).

Murray DW, MacLennan GS, Breeman S, Dakin HA, Johnston L, Campbell MK, Gray AM, Fiddian N, Fitzpatrick R, Morris RW, Grant AM; KAT group.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(19):1-235, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta18190.

5.

Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(4):1-57. Epub 2006 Feb 1.

6.

A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint.

Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Griffin DR, Costa ML.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jan 14;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-8.

7.

A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip.

de Verteuil R, Imamura M, Zhu S, Glazener C, Fraser C, Munro N, Hutchison J, Grant A, Coyle D, Coyle K, Vale L.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(26):iii-iv, ix-223. Review.

8.

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Junnila M, Kostensalo I, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Itälä A, Mäkelä K.

Scand J Surg. 2014 Mar;103(1):54-9. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495345. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

PMID:
24345980
9.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimal access surgery amongst people with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a UK collaborative study. The REFLUX trial.

Grant A, Wileman S, Ramsay C, Bojke L, Epstein D, Sculpher M, Macran S, Kilonzo M, Vale L, Francis J, Mowat A, Krukowski Z, Heading R, Thursz M, Russell I, Campbell M; REFLUX Trial Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Sep;12(31):1-181, iii-iv.

10.

The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):318-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1029-x. Epub 2009 Aug 21.

11.

Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis.

Heintzbergen S, Kulin NA, Ijzerman MJ, Steuten LM, Werle J, Khong H, Marshall DA.

Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):942-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.021.

12.

Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.

Lavigne M, Laffosse JM, Ganapathi M, Girard J, Vendittoli P.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May;93 Suppl 2:93-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01711.

PMID:
21543697
13.

Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?

Bozic KJ, Pui CM, Ludeman MJ, Vail TP, Silverstein MD.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep;468(9):2301-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1301-0.

14.

Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.

Asaad A, Hart A, Khoo MM, Ilo K, Schaller G, Black JD, Muirhead-Allwood S.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3770-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4348-0. Erratum in: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3985.

15.

Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Mont MA, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Marulanda GA, Delanois RE.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88 Suppl 3:90-7.

PMID:
17079373
16.

Current expert views on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Consensus of the 6th advanced Hip resurfacing course, Ghent, Belgium, May 2014.

Van Der Straeten C, De Smet KA.

Hip Int. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000288. Epub 2015 Oct 6. Review.

PMID:
26449333
17.

The prevalence of groin pain after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and total hip resurfacing.

Bartelt RB, Yuan BJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep;468(9):2346-56. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1356-y.

18.
19.

BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A.

Shaw L, Rodgers H, Price C, van Wijck F, Shackley P, Steen N, Barnes M, Ford G, Graham L; BoTULS investigators.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(26):1-113, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14260.

20.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Revell MP, McBryde CW, Bhatnagar S, Pynsent PB, Treacy RB.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88 Suppl 3:98-103.

PMID:
17079374

Supplemental Content

Support Center