Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 87

1.

Idiopathic liver function test abnormality in pregnancy is associated with assisted reproduction techniques.

Kopylov U, Avidan B, Papageorgiou NP, Katz LH, Sivan E, Zimlichman E, Hussein H, Maor Y.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.015. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

PMID:
23062734
2.

Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.

Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):922-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.049. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

PMID:
22763098
3.

Second trimester amniocentesis in assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins.

Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2572-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.080.

PMID:
18675413
4.

Maternal characteristics and twin gestation outcomes over 10 years: impact of conception methods.

Bamberg C, Fotopoulou C, Neissner P, Slowinski T, Dudenhausen JW, Proquitte H, B├╝hrer C, Henrich W.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 May 17.

PMID:
22608318
5.

Pregnancy outcomes in very advanced maternal age pregnancies: the impact of assisted reproductive technology.

Jackson S, Hong C, Wang ET, Alexander C, Gregory KD, Pisarska MD.

Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan;103(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.037. Epub 2014 Oct 25.

PMID:
25450294
6.

Risk factors for adverse outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies.

Luke B, Brown MB, Nugent C, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Witter FR, Newman RB.

Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):315-9.

PMID:
14967366
7.

Primiparity, assisted reproduction, and preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a population based study.

Erez O, Mayer A, Shoham-Vardi I, Dukler D, Mazor M.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;277(4):311-7. Epub 2007 Oct 31.

PMID:
17972089
8.

The effect of early fetal losses on twin assisted-conception pregnancy outcomes.

Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Stern JE, Klein N, Cedars MI.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2586-92. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.020. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

PMID:
18804206
9.

The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Moragianni VA, Jones SM, Ryley DA.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 12.

PMID:
22584023
10.

Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.

Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, Jeng G.

MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003 Aug 29;52(9):1-16. Erratum in: MMWR 2003 Oct 3; 52(39):942.

11.

Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies.

Daniel Y, Ochshorn Y, Fait G, Geva E, Bar-Am A, Lessing JB.

Fertil Steril. 2000 Oct;74(4):683-9.

PMID:
11020507
12.

Prospective evaluation of abnormal liver function tests in pregnancy.

Harish K, Nitha R, Harikumar R, Sunil Kumar K, Varghese T, Sreedevi NS, Bushrath K, Sandesh K, Tony J.

Trop Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct-Dec;26(4):188-93.

PMID:
16737048
13.

Paternal body mass index is associated with decreased blastocyst development and reduced live birth rates following assisted reproductive technology.

Bakos HW, Henshaw RC, Mitchell M, Lane M.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;95(5):1700-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.044. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

PMID:
21145051
14.

Implications of assisted reproductive technologies on term singleton birth weight: an analysis of 25,777 children in the national assisted reproduction registry of Japan.

Nakashima A, Araki R, Tani H, Ishihara O, Kuwahara A, Irahara M, Yoshimura Y, Kuramoto T, Saito H, Nakaza A, Sakumoto T.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.027. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

PMID:
23058683
15.

Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.

D'Angelo DV, Whitehead N, Helms K, Barfield W, Ahluwalia IB.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):314-320.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.073. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

PMID:
21718990
16.

Depressive symptoms during late pregnancy and early parenthood following assisted reproductive technology.

Monti F, Agostini F, Fagandini P, La Sala GB, Blickstein I.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Mar;91(3):851-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.021. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

PMID:
18314111
17.

Outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies at the Nairobi In Vitro Fertilisation Centre.

Noreh LJ, Tucs O, Sekadde-Kigondu CB, Noreh JA.

East Afr Med J. 2009 Apr;86(4):156-61.

PMID:
20084998
18.

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.

Gunby J, Daya S; IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society.

Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1356-64.

PMID:
17070192
19.

Twin tubal pregnancy: a rising complication?

Svirsky R, Maymon R, Vaknin Z, Mendlovic S, Weissman A, Halperin R, Herman A, Pansky M.

Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1910.e13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Apr 22.

PMID:
20416870
20.

Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study.

Reubinoff BE, Samueloff A, Ben-Haim M, Friedler S, Schenker JG, Lewin A.

Fertil Steril. 1997 Jun;67(6):1077-83.

PMID:
9176447

Supplemental Content

Support Center