Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 133

1.

Flap-off epi-LASIK versus automated epithelial brush in PRK: a prospective comparison study of pain and reepithelialization times.

Magone MT, Engle AT, Easter TH, Stanley PF, Howells J, Pasternak JF.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;28(10):682-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120921-02.

PMID:
23061997
2.

Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.

Kalyvianaki MI, Kymionis GD, Kounis GA, Panagopoulou SI, Grentzelos MA, Pallikaris IG.

Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.025.

PMID:
19041475
3.

Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia.

Wang QM, Fu AC, Yu Y, Xu CC, Wang XX, Chen SH, Yu AY.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2390-4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0827.

PMID:
18515581
4.

Visual outcomes after Epi-LASIK and PRK for low and moderate myopia.

Sia RK, Coe CD, Edwards JD, Ryan DS, Bower KS.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):65-71. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111004-01. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

PMID:
21985667
5.

Effect of flap removal in myopic epi-LASIK surgery on visual rehabilitation and postoperative pain: a prospective intraindividual study.

Na KS, Lee KM, Park SH, Lee HS, Joo CK.

Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(5):325-31. doi: 10.1159/000313834. Epub 2010 Apr 30.

PMID:
20431312
6.

Comparison of Tear cytokines and clinical outcomes between off-flap and on-flap epi-LASIK with mitomycin C.

Zhang Y, Chen YG, Xia YJ, Qi H.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;28(9):632-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120815-01.

PMID:
22947291
7.
8.

Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopic findings between epi-LASIK procedures with different management of the epithelial flaps.

Chen WL, Shen EP, Hsieh YT, Yeh PT, Wang TJ, Hu FR.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 1;52(6):3640-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6390.

PMID:
21357404
9.

Effect of repositioning or discarding the epithelial flap in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis.

Taneri S, Oehler S, Koch J, Azar D.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;37(10):1832-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.026.

PMID:
21930046
10.

Postoperative pain following epi-LASIK, LASEK, and PRK for myopia.

O'Doherty M, Kirwan C, O'Keeffe M, O'Doherty J.

J Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;23(2):133-8.

PMID:
17326352
11.
12.

Early postoperative pain following Epi-LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, comparative, bilateral study.

Torres LF, Sancho C, Tan B, Padilla K, Schanzlin DJ, Chayet AS.

J Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;23(2):126-32.

PMID:
17326351
13.

PRK and butterfly LASEK: prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of epithelial healing and ocular discomfort.

Ghanem VC, Souza GC, Souza DC, Viese JM, Weber SL, Kara-José N.

J Refract Surg. 2008 Jun;24(6):591-9.

PMID:
18581784
14.

A prospective bilateral comparison of epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia.

Hondur A, Bilgihan K, Hasanreisoglu B.

J Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;24(9):928-34.

PMID:
19044234
15.

Laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

Camellin M.

J Refract Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):666-70.

PMID:
14640432
16.

Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia.

El-Maghraby A, Salah T, Waring GO 3rd, Klyce S, Ibrahim O.

Ophthalmology. 1999 Mar;106(3):447-57.

PMID:
10080199
17.
19.

Comparison of postoperative pain in patients following photorefractive keratectomy versus advanced surface ablation.

Blake CR, Cervantes-Castañeda RA, Macias-Rodríguez Y, Anzoulatous G, Anderson R, Chayet AS.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jul;31(7):1314-9.

PMID:
16105600
20.

Bilateral comparison of conventional epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis and lamellar epithelial debridement for moderate to high myopia.

Kim JH, Lim T, Lee HG, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H.

Cornea. 2010 Aug;29(8):853-7. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca33e6.

PMID:
20508509

Supplemental Content

Support Center